Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37015789›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2023

Violence against nurses in the emergency department: an observational study.

Muriel Chazel, Sandrine Alonso, Jane Price, Sarah Kabani, Christophe Demattei, Pascale Fabbro-Peray

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02116439 (Evaluation of the Manifestation of Patient Aggresivity in an Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02116439 completednot on this map

Evaluation of the Manifestation of Patient Aggresivity in an Emergency Department

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2014 to 2014Enrolled30ConditionsEmergency Room
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A scoping review of risk determinants for workplace violence in emergency departments.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muriel ChazelDepartment of Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Nimes, Languedoc-Roussillon, France muriel.chazel@chu-nimes.fr.
Sandrine AlonsoDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Nimes, Languedoc-Roussillon, France.
Jane PriceNursing Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Nimes, Languedoc-Roussillon, France.
Sarah KabaniDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Nimes, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9730-8885
Christophe DematteiDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Nimes, Languedoc-Roussillon, France.
Pascale Fabbro-PerayDepartment of Biostatistics, Clinical Epidemiology, Public Health and Innovation in Methodology (BESPIM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nimes, Nimes, Languedoc-Roussillon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the number and risk factors of violent events encountered in the emergency department. An observation grid was developed following interviews with emergency department staff to target the most pertinent information to collect in a prospective study design.

designObservational study.

settingEmergency department of a tertiary hospital in France. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of violent events occurring during a single shift, recorded over 6 months by two observers. Information collected included time and date of incident; number of male/female staff; number of patients and accompaniers present in the service and the waiting room and length of staff debriefing. Perpetrator, victim and patient information were collected. Victims were followed-up 72 hours later.

resultsEighty-two periods were observed between November 2015 and April 2016 recording 35 violent incidents affecting 37 perpetrators and 48 victims, equally distributed over the days of the week and months of the year. The median interval until violence was 0 [0-96] min from entry. Eight (23%) events were officially reported, with two (6%) resulting in charges being pressed. No risk factors were significantly associated with violent incidents in multivariate analysis, although there was a tendency towards significance for fewer senior female doctors present (p=0.0787) and a resulting longer debriefing session (p=0.0712).

conclusionsWe confirm the high rate of violence in the emergency department and poor level of official reporting. Strategies should be implemented to anticipate and reduce incidence and encourage reporting by affected staff. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02116439.

Indexed as

ViolenceWorkplace ViolenceAggressionCausalityEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHRisk management

Identifiers

PMID37015789
PMCPMC10083775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.