Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37015392›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2023

A Skewed Loss Function for Correcting Predictive Bias in Brain Age Prediction.

Hanzhi Wang, Matthias S Treder, David Marshall, Derek K Jones, Yuhua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Systematic Bias of Machine Learning Regression Models and Correction.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hanzhi Wang
Matthias S Treder
David Marshall
Derek K Jones
Yuhua Li

Funding

Wellcome Trust 096646Wellcome Trust 104943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In neuroimaging, the difference between predicted brain age and chronological age, known as brain age delta, has shown its potential as a biomarker related to various pathological phenotypes. There is a frequently observed bias when estimating brain age delta using regression models. This bias manifests as an overestimation of brain age for young participants and an underestimation of brain age for older participants. Therefore, the brain age delta is negatively correlated with chronological age, which can be problematic when evaluating relationships between brain age delta and other age-associated variables. This paper proposes a novel bias correction method for regression models by introducing a skewed loss function to replace the normal symmetric loss function. The regression model then behaves differently depending on whether it makes overestimations or underestimations. Our approach works with any type of MR image and no specific preprocessing is required, as long as the image is sensitive to age-related changes. The proposed approach has been validated using three classic deep learning models, namely ResNet, VGG, and GoogleNet on publicly available neuroimaging aging datasets. It shows flexibility across different model architectures and different choices of hyperparameters. The corrected brain age delta from our approach then has no linear relationship with chronological age and achieves higher predictive accuracy than a commonly-used two-stage approach.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID37015392
PMCPMC7615262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.