Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37015010›Full record

Trial reportBiometrics2023

Estimating optimal individualized treatment rules with multistate processes.

Giorgos Bakoyannis

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Biometrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giorgos BakoyannisDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2789-2497

Funding

Statistical methods for characterizing patients who highly-benefit from treatments and programs in Alzheimers, HIV, and other heterogeneous diseasesR01AI140854 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FRANGAKIS, CONSTANTINE E · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
Estimating the cascade of HIV care under incomplete outcome ascertainmentR21AI145662 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BAKOYANNIS, GIORGOS · 2019 to 2020
$433k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140854NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI145662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multistate process data are common in studies of chronic diseases such as cancer. These data are ideal for precision medicine purposes as they can be leveraged to improve more refined health outcomes, compared to standard survival outcomes, as well as incorporate patient preferences regarding quantity versus quality of life. However, there are currently no methods for the estimation of optimal individualized treatment rules with such data. In this paper, we propose a nonparametric outcome weighted learning approach for this problem in randomized clinical trial settings. The theoretical properties of the proposed methods, including Fisher consistency and asymptotic normality of the estimated expected outcome under the estimated optimal individualized treatment rule, are rigorously established. A consistent closed-form variance estimator is provided and methodology for the calculation of simultaneous confidence intervals is proposed. Simulation studies show that the proposed methodology and inference procedures work well even with small-sample sizes and high rates of right censoring. The methodology is illustrated using data from a randomized clinical trial on the treatment of metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalQuality of LifeComputer SimulationHumansPrecision Medicinemultistate modeloutcome-weighted learningpatient preferencesprecision medicineresponse

Identifiers

PMID37015010
PMCPMC10553793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.