Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014911›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2023

Syrian hamster convalescence from prototype SARS-CoV-2 confers measurable protection against the attenuated disease caused by the Omicron variant.

Kathryn A Ryan, Kevin R Bewley, Robert J Watson, Christopher Burton, Oliver Carnell, Breeze E Cavell, Amy Challis, Naomi S Coombes, Elizabeth R Davies, Jack Edun-Huges and 31 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Omicron breakthrough infections in vaccinated or previously infected hamsters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Kathryn A RyanUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8608-1144
Kevin R BewleyUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Robert J WatsonUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Christopher BurtonUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Oliver CarnellUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Breeze E CavellUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Amy ChallisUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Naomi S CoombesUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth R DaviesUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Jack Edun-HugesUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Kirsty EmeryUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Rachel FellUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Susan A FotheringhamUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Karen E GoochUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Kathryn GowanUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Alastair HandleyUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Debbie J HarrisUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Richard HespUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Laura HunterUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Richard HumphreysUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Rachel JohnsonUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Chelsea KennardUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Daniel KnottUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Sian ListerUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Daniel MorleyUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Didier NgaboUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Karen L OsmanUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Jemma PatersonUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth J PennUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Steven T PullanUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Kevin S RichardsUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Sian SummersUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Stephen R ThomasUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Thomas WeldonUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Nathan R WiblinUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Emma L RaynerUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Richard T VipondUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Bassam HallisUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Francisco J SalgueroUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Simon G P FunnellUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Yper HallUK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mutation profile of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (lineage BA.1) variant posed a concern for naturally acquired and vaccine-induced immunity. We investigated the ability of prior infection with an early SARS-CoV-2 ancestral isolate (Australia/VIC01/2020, VIC01) to protect against disease caused by BA.1. We established that BA.1 infection in naïve Syrian hamsters resulted in a less severe disease than a comparable dose of the ancestral virus, with fewer clinical signs including less weight loss. We present data to show that these clinical observations were almost absent in convalescent hamsters challenged with the same dose of BA.1 50 days after an initial infection with ancestral virus. These data provide evidence that convalescent immunity against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 is protective against BA.1 in the Syrian hamster model of infection. Comparison with published pre-clinical and clinical data supports consistency of the model and its predictive value for the outcome in humans. Further, the ability to detect protection against the less severe disease caused by BA.1 demonstrates continued value of the Syrian hamster model for evaluation of BA.1-specific countermeasures.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnimalsConvalescenceCricetinaeHumansMesocricetusSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37014911
PMCPMC10104347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.