Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014706›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy: A 10-year national follow-up study.

Tea Kuittinen, Sari Tulokas, Päivi Rahkola-Soisalo, Tea Brummer, Jyrki Jalkanen, Eija Tomas, Juha Mäkinen, Jari Sjöberg, Päivi Härkki, Maarit Mentula

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sexual function and pelvic floor function five years after hysterectomy.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pelvic organ prolapse after hysterectomy: A 10-year national follow-up study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tea KuittinenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-376X
Sari TulokasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2039-8242
Päivi Rahkola-SoisaloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Tea BrummerCentral Hospital Østfold, Østfold, Norway.
Jyrki JalkanenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Central Finland Hospital District, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Eija TomasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Juha MäkinenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jari SjöbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Päivi HärkkiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Maarit MentulaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FICentral Finland Health Care District · FIØstfold Hospital Trust · NOTampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

Women's Clinic of Helsinki University Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHysterectomy may have an effect on the pelvic floor. Here, we evaluated the rates and risks for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgeries and visits among women with a history of hysterectomy for benign indication excluding POP. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study 3582 women who underwent hysterectomy in 2006 were followed until the end of 2016. The cohort was linked to the Finnish Care Register to catch any prolapse-related diagnoses and operation codes following the hysterectomy. Different hysterectomy approaches were compared according to the risk for a prolapse, including abdominal, laparoscopic, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal and vaginal. The main outcomes were POP surgery and outpatient visit for POP, and Cox regression was used to identify risk factors (hazard ratios [HR]).

resultsDuring the follow-up, 58 women (1.6%) underwent a POP operation, of which a posterior repair was the most common (n = 39, 1.1%). Outpatient visits for POP symptoms occurred in 92 (2.6%) women of which posterior wall prolapses (n = 58, 1.6%) were the most common. History of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy were associated with risk for POP operation (HR 3.0, p = 0.02), vaginal vault prolapse operation (HR 4.3, p = 0.01) and POP visits (HR 2.2, p < 0.01) as compared to the approach of abdominal hysterectomy. History of vaginal deliveries and concomitant stress urinary continence operation were associated with the risk for a POP operation (HR 4.4 and 11.9) and POP visits (HR 3.9 and 7.2).

conclusionsRisk for POP operations and outpatient visits for POP symptoms in hysterectomized women without a preceding POP seems to be small at least 10 years after hysterectomy. History of LAVH, vaginal deliveries and concomitant stress urinary incontinence operations increased the risk for POP operations after hysterectomy. These data can be utilized in counseling women considering hysterectomy for benign indication.

Indexed as

HysterectomyPelvic Organ ProlapseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomy, VaginalMaleRetrospective Studiesdifferent approacheshysterectomypelvic organ prolapsePOP operationPOP visit

Identifiers

PMID37014706
PMCPMC10072247
OpenAlexW4362521609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.