Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014692›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Management of Pain and Cachexia in Pancreatic Cancer: Protocol for Two Systematic Reviews, Network Meta-Analysis, Surveys, and Focus Groups.

Danielle Amanda Roberts, Eila Watson, Christopher Macdonald, Yarunnessa Khan, Sarah Prideaux, Alwin Puthiyakunnel Saji, Emilia Postaleniec, Jashan Selvakumar, Mahta Haghighat Ghahfarokhi, Brian Davidson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle Amanda RobertsDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1515-5702
Eila WatsonSupportive Cancer Care Research Group, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3592-1315
Christopher MacdonaldPancreatic Cancer UK, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6212-8948
Yarunnessa KhanPancreatic Cancer UK, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4840-9403
Sarah PrideauxPatient and Public Involvement Representative, England, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0231-1607
Alwin Puthiyakunnel SajiSchool of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7359-6640
Emilia PostaleniecLeicester Medical School, The University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6798-5510
Jashan SelvakumarSt George's, University of London Medical School, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7148-0003
Mahta Haghighat GhahfarokhiGuy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8995-9776
Brian DavidsonDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9152-5907
Kurinchi GurusamyDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, Hampstead Campus, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-9134
University College London · GBPancreatic Cancer Action · GBCardiff University · GBKing's College London · GBOxford Brookes University · GBSt George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 75% of people with pancreatic cancer experience pain, and >50% of them have cachexia (weakness and wasting of the body). However, there is considerable uncertainty regarding the management of these distressing symptoms.

objectiveOur primary objectives are to compare the relative benefits and harms of different interventions for pain in people with unresectable pancreatic cancer and for prevention and treatment of cachexia due to pancreatic cancer, through systematic reviews and network meta-analysis. Our secondary objectives are to develop an evidence-based clinical care pathway to manage pain and prevent and treat cachexia in people with pancreatic cancer through surveys and focus groups involving patients, carers, and health care professionals.

methodsWe will perform 2 systematic reviews of the literature related to pain and cachexia in people with pancreatic cancer using searches from Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, and trial registries. Two researchers will independently screen for eligibility and identify randomized controlled trials (no language or publication status restriction), comparing interventions for pain or cachexia based on full-texts for articles shortlisted during screening. We will assess risk of bias in the trials using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (version 2.0) and obtain data related to baseline prognostic characteristics, potential effect modifiers and outcome data related to overall survival, health-related quality of life, treatment-related complications, and resource utilisation. We aim to conduct network meta-analysis on outcomes with multiple treatment comparisons where possible, otherwise, meta-analysis with direct comparisons, or narrative synthesis. We will perform various subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Using information obtained from both systematic reviews, we will conduct 2 surveys: one directed to patients or carers to assess acceptability of interventions, and the other to health care professionals to assess feasibility of delivery in the National Health Service. Four mixed focus groups will be conducted to evaluate findings and foster consensus in the development of the care pathway.

resultsFunding was awarded from April 2022 (NIHR202727). Both systematic review protocols were prospectively registered on PROSPERO in May 2022. Formal searches began thereafter. Approval by the University College London Research Ethics Committee (23563/001) was received in December 2022. Data collection began in January 2023; data analysis will begin in May 2023 (completion expected by October 2023).

conclusionsThis study will comprehensively encompass major interventions for management of pain in people with unresectable pancreatic cancer, and prevention and treatment of cachexia in people with pancreatic cancer. Key stakeholders will facilitate the development of an evidence-based care pathway, ensuring both acceptability and feasibility. The project ends in April 2024 and published results are expected within 12 months of completion. We aim to present the findings through patient group websites, conferences, and publications, irrespective of the findings, in a peer-reviewed journal. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/46335.

Indexed as

cachexiapain reliefpalliative carepancreatic cancerquality of lifesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37014692
PMCPMC10139686
OpenAlexW4322208125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.