Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014674›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Effectiveness of the Internet of Things for Improving Working-Aged Women's Health in High-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Noyuri Yamaji, Aya Nitamizu, Etsuko Nishimura, Daichi Suzuki, Kiriko Sasayama, Md Obaidur Rahman, Eiko Saito, Daisuke Yoneoka, Erika Ota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noyuri YamajiGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4212-6723
Aya NitamizuGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-490X
Etsuko NishimuraGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-0642
Daichi SuzukiDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Kanagawa Institute of Technology, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5294-8536
Kiriko SasayamaGlobal Health Nursing, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2917-5536
Md Obaidur RahmanCenter for Surveillance, Immunization, and Epidemiologic Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0931-6242
Eiko SaitoInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4550-9631
Daisuke YoneokaCenter for Surveillance, Immunization, and Epidemiologic Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-5092
Erika OtaGlobal Health Nursing, Graduate School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3945-7441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen often experience many unique health issues and conditions throughout their working lives. The Internet of Things (IoT) is a system of interrelated digital devices that can enable data exchanges over a network without human-to-human or human-to-computer interaction. The usage of applications and IoT in improving women's health has recently increased worldwide. However, there has been no consensus on the effectiveness of IoT in improving women's health outcomes.

objectiveThis systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to assess and synthesize the role of apps and the IoT in improving women's health and to identify the ranking of interventions for ensuring better results for each stated outcome.

methodsOur systematic review and NMA will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook. We will comprehensively search the following electronic databases: PubMed (including MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (ie, CINAHL), PsycINFO, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry, along with other resources to identify relevant randomized controlled trials that have assessed the effects of various apps and the IoT with regard to improving working-aged women's health in high-income countries. We will segment and analyze the results of the included studies based on age categories (women undergoing a preconception period, those undergoing gestational and postpartum periods, and menopausal and pre- and postmenopausal women) and the medical history (women who have a specific medical condition-eg, cancer or diabetes-and women who do not have them) separately. Two independent reviewers will perform the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Our primary outcomes include health status, well-being, and quality of life. We will perform pairwise meta-analysis and NMA to estimate the direct, indirect, and relative effects of apps and the IoT on women's health outcomes. We will also assess the hierarchy of interventions, statistical inconsistencies, and certainties of evidence for each outcome.

resultsWe plan to conduct the search in January 2023 and are currently discussing search strategies with the literature search specialists. The final report is planned for submission to a peer-reviewed journal in September 2023.

conclusionsTo the best of our knowledge, this review will be the first to identify the ranking of IoT intervention for ensuring working-aged women's health outcomes. These findings may be of great use to researchers, policy makers, and others with an interest in the field.

trial registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42022384620; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=384620. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/45178.

Indexed as

applicationappsdigital healthhealth apphigh incomeInternet of ThingsIoTmeta analysesmeta analysismHealthmobile healthnetwork meta-analysisreview methodsystematic reviewwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID37014674
PMCPMC10131648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.