Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014641›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Zhongwen Huang, Feifan Xiao, Hui Xiao, Yulan Lu, Lin Yang, Deyi Zhuang, Liping Chen, Qiufen Wei, Yinmo Jiang, Gang Li and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongwen HuangCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Feifan XiaoCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Hui XiaoCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Yulan LuCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Lin YangDepartment of Endocrinology and Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Deyi ZhuangDepartment of Neonatology, Xiamen Children's Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Liping ChenDepartment of Neonatology, Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Qiufen WeiDepartment of Neonatology, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yinmo JiangCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Gang LiCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Bingbing WuCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhiwei LiuDepartment of Neonatology, International Peace Maternity and Children Hospital of China Welfare Institution, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Wenhao ZhouCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Huijun WangCenter for Molecular Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, National Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Children's Hospital of Fudan University · CNChildren’s Hospital of Fudan University Xiamen Branch · CNGuangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNJiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: A growing number of children are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, there is a lack of studies systematically analyzing the genetic landscape of live-born children conceived through ART who need intensive care in the neonatal period. Objective: To investigate the incidence and type of molecular defects among neonates conceived through ART who are in intensive care units (NICUs) with suspected genetic conditions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study using data from the China Neonatal Genomes Project, a multicenter national neonatal genome data set managed by the Children's Hospital of Fudan University. All participants were from level III and IV NICUs and included 535 neonates conceived through ART with suspected genetic conditions, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, and 1316 naturally conceived neonates with suspected genetic conditions in the same clinical settings, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The data were analyzed between September 2021 and January 2023. Exposures: Whole-exome sequencing or target clinical exome sequencing with pathogenic or likely pathogenic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) and copy number variation (CNV) detection was performed for each individual. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the molecular diagnostic yield, mode of inheritance, spectrum of genetic events, and incidence of de novo variants. Results: A total of 535 neonates conceived through ART (319 boys [59.6%]) and 1316 naturally conceived neonates (772 boys [58.7%]) were included. A genetic diagnosis was established for 54 patients conceived through ART (10.1%), including 34 patients with SNVs (63.0%) and 20 with CNVs (37.0%). In the non-ART group, 174 patients (13.2%) received a genetic diagnosis, including 120 patients with SNVs (69.0%) and 54 with CNVs (31.0%). The overall diagnostic yield was comparable between the ART group and the naturally conceived neonates (10.1% vs 13.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02), as was the proportion of SNVs (63.0% vs 69.0%; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00) and CNVs (37.0% vs 31.0%; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54-1.53) detected by sequencing. Furthermore, the proportions of de novo variants in the ART group and the non-ART group were similar (75.9% [41 of 54] vs 64.4% [112 of 174]; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.62-1.30). Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study of neonates in NICUs suggests that the overall genetic diagnostic yield and the incidence of de novo variants were similar between live-born neonates conceived through ART and naturally conceived neonates in the same settings.

Indexed as

Genetic ProfilePregnancy OutcomeChildCross-Sectional StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMalePregnancyReproductive Techniques, Assisted

Identifiers

PMID37014641
PMCPMC10074225
OpenAlexW4362520604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.