Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014611›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023

Familiarity influences visual detection in a task that does not require explicit recognition.

Pei-Ling Yang, Diane M Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pei-Ling YangDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 603 E. Daniel St., Champaign, IL, 61820, USA. plyang2@illinois.edu.
Diane M BeckDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 603 E. Daniel St., Champaign, IL, 61820, USA.

Funding

Office of Naval Research Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative N000141410671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current study aims to explore one factor that likely contributes to these statistical regularities, familiarity. Are highly familiar stimuli perceived more readily? Previous work showing effects of familiarity on perception have used recognition tasks, which arguably tap into post-perceptual processes. Here we use a perceptual task that does not depend on explicit recognition; participants were asked to discriminate whether a rapidly presented image was intact or scrambled. The familiarity level of stimuli was manipulated. Results show that famous or upright orientated logos (Experiments 1 and 2) or faces (Experiment 3) were better discriminated than novel or inverted logos and faces. To further dissociate our task from recognition, we implemented a simple detection task (Experiment 4) and directly compared the intact/scrambled task to a recognition task (Experiment 5) on the same set of faces used in Experiment 3. The fame and orientation familiarity effect were still present in the simple detection task, and the duration needed on the intact/scrambled task was significantly less than the recognition task. We conclude that familiarity effect demonstrated here is not driven by explicit recognition and instead reflects a true perceptual effect.

Indexed as

FaceRecognition, PsychologyHumansOrientation, SpatialPattern Recognition, VisualFace perceptionVisual perception

Identifiers

PMID37014611
PMCPMC10072023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.