ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2023
Familiarity influences visual detection in a task that does not require explicit recognition.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Divergent roles of visual structure and conceptual meaning in scene detection and categorization.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The role of expansion and adaptability of face-space for individual differences in face identity processing.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Temporal dynamics of hemispheric interactions in visual word recognition using a repetition priming paradigm: modulation by stimulus onset asynchrony.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Image memorability is linked to facilitated perceptual and semantic processing.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current study aims to explore one factor that likely contributes to these statistical regularities, familiarity. Are highly familiar stimuli perceived more readily? Previous work showing effects of familiarity on perception have used recognition tasks, which arguably tap into post-perceptual processes. Here we use a perceptual task that does not depend on explicit recognition; participants were asked to discriminate whether a rapidly presented image was intact or scrambled. The familiarity level of stimuli was manipulated. Results show that famous or upright orientated logos (Experiments 1 and 2) or faces (Experiment 3) were better discriminated than novel or inverted logos and faces. To further dissociate our task from recognition, we implemented a simple detection task (Experiment 4) and directly compared the intact/scrambled task to a recognition task (Experiment 5) on the same set of faces used in Experiment 3. The fame and orientation familiarity effect were still present in the simple detection task, and the duration needed on the intact/scrambled task was significantly less than the recognition task. We conclude that familiarity effect demonstrated here is not driven by explicit recognition and instead reflects a true perceptual effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.