Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014592›Full record

ReviewNeotropical entomology2023

On-farm Production of Microbial Entomopathogens for use in Agriculture: Brazil as a Case Study.

Marcos Faria, Gabriel Moura Mascarin, Tariq Butt, Rogerio Biaggioni Lopes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neotropical entomology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Commercial and on-farm microbial bioinputs production systems: challenges, opportunities and current Brazilian regulatory framework.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Review
  3. Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Utilization ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcos FariaEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Parque Estação Biológica, W5 Norte, Brasília, DF, 70770-917, Brazil. marcos.faria@embrapa.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9420-0916
Gabriel Moura MascarinEmbrapa Environment, Jaguariúna, SP, Brazil.
Tariq ButtDept of Biosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea Univ, Swansea, UK.
Rogerio Biaggioni LopesEmbrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Parque Estação Biológica, W5 Norte, Brasília, DF, 70770-917, Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BRSwansea University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Brazil, the production of beneficial microorganisms by growers exclusively for their own use is a practice known as "on-farm production". Regarding on-farm bioinsecticides, they were initially deployed for pests of perennial and semi-perennial crops in the 1970s but, since 2013, their use has extended to pests of annual crops such as maize, cotton, and soybean. Millions of hectares are currently being treated with these on-farm preparations. Local production reduces costs, meets local needs, and reduces inputs of environmentally damaging chemical pesticides, facilitating establishment of more sustainable agroecosystems. Critics argue that without implementation of stringent quality control measures there is the risk that the on-farm preparations: (1) are contaminated with microbes which may include human pathogens or (2) contain very little active ingredient, impacting on field efficacy. The on-farm fermentation of bacterial insecticides predominates, especially that of Bacillus thuringiensis targeting lepidopteran pests. However, there has been a rapid growth in the past 5 years in the production of entomopathogenic fungi, mostly for the control of sap-sucking insects such as whitefly (Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)) and the corn leafhopper (Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott)). In contrast, on-farm production of insect viruses has seen limited growth. Most of the ca. 5 million rural producers in Brazil own small or medium size properties and, although the vast majority still do not practice on-farm production of biopesticides, the topic has aroused interest among them. Many growers who adopt this practice usually use non-sterile containers as fermenters, resulting in poor-quality preparations, and cases of failure have been reported. On the other hand, some informal reports suggest on-farm preparations may be efficacious even when contaminated, what could be explained, at least partially, by the insecticidal secondary metabolites secreted by the pool of microorganisms in the liquid culture media. Indeed, there is insufficient information on efficacy and mode of action of these microbial biopesticides. It is usually the large farms, some with > 20,000 ha of continuous cultivated lands, that produce biopesticides with low levels of contamination, as many of them possess advanced production facilities and have access to specialized knowledge and trained staff. Uptake of on-farm biopesticides is expected to continue but the rate of adoption will depend on factors such as the selection of safe, virulent microbial strains and implementation of sound quality control measures (compliance with emerging Brazilian regulations and international standards). The challenges and opportunities of on-farm bioinsecticides are presented and discussed.

Indexed as

HemipteraInsecticidesAgricultureAnimalsBiological Control AgentsBrazilFarmsHumansInsect ControlPest Control, BiologicalBiological Control AgentsInsecticidesBacillusbaculovirusesBiological controlentomopathogenic fungimicrobial biopesticides

Identifiers

PMID37014592
OpenAlexW4362521287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.