Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014564›Full record

ReviewMaternal and child health journal2023

A Conceptual Framework for Group Well-Child Care: A Tool to Guide Implementation, Evaluation, and Research.

Ashley Gresh, Deborah Wilson, Ada Fenick, Crystal L Patil, Tumaini Coker, Sharon Schindler Rising, Nancy Glass, Rheanna Platt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrating postnatal care into the redesign of group care beyond birth.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashley GreshJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. Ashley.gresh@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7181-8219
Deborah WilsonJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Ada FenickYale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Crystal L PatilCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, 845 S Damen Ave, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Tumaini CokerSeattle Children's Research Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA.
Sharon Schindler RisingGroup Care Global, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nancy GlassJohns Hopkins University School of Nursing, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Rheanna PlattJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Pediatric Group Well Child Visits for Detection of Maternal Depression in LatinasK23MH118431 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PLATT, RHEANNA EDITH · 2019 to 2021
$594k
Adapting and Implementing Group-Based Postpartum/Well-Child Care at Clinics In Blantyre District, MalawiF31NR019205 · NINR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRESH, ASHLEY KATRINA · 2020 to 2022
$142k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIH HHS K23MH118431NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH118431NINR NIH HHS F31 NR019205NINR NIH HHS F31NR019205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use scoping review methods to construct a conceptual framework based on current evidence of group well-child care to guide future practice and research.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) six stages. We used constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the quadruple aim of health care improvement to guide the construction of the conceptual framework.

resultsThe resulting conceptual framework is a synthesis of the key concepts of group well-child care, beginning with a call for a system redesign of well-child care to improve outcomes while acknowledging the theoretical antecedents structuring the rationale that supports the model. Inputs of group well-child care include health systems contexts; administration/logistics; clinical setting; group care clinic team; community/patient population; and curriculum development and training. The core components of group well-child care included structure (e.g., group size, facilitators), content (e.g., health assessments, service linkages). and process (e.g., interactive learning and community building). We found clinical outcomes in all four dimensions of the quadruple aim of healthcare.

conclusionOur conceptual framework can guide model implementation and identifies several outcomes that can be used to harmonize model evaluation and research. Future research and practice can use the conceptual framework as a tool to standardize model implementation and evaluation and generate evidence to inform future healthcare policy and practice.

Indexed as

Child CareDelivery of Health CareChildChild HealthHumansGroup careGroup well-child careMaternal and child healthPediatric primary carePreventive medicine/methods

Identifiers

PMID37014564
PMCPMC10071241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.