SynthesisCardiovascular drugs and therapy2024
Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Significant Mitral Stenosis-a Preliminary Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- DOACs vs warfarin in AF with comorbid CKD or valvular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Blood vessels, thrombosis & hemostasis · 2026Review
- Drug-induced adverse events in modern pharmacotherapy: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and implications for risk assessment and management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Research Advances in Timing of Anticoagulant Therapy Following Cardioembolic Stroke.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Review
- A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on the use of DOACs in Patients With Arterial and Venous Thrombosis.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPatients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and concomitant moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis (MS) are listed as a contraindicated population to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) because of the traditional tenet of high stroke risk, despite scarce evidence. With accumulating data, we sought to conduct a systematic meta-analysis to preliminarily explore the efficacy and safety of DOAC versus warfarin in patients with AF and concomitant significant MS.
methodsWe searched the Medline, Embase databases, and the Cochrane Library (assessed October 10th, 2022) for eligible studies. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesized in Stata 16.1 (StataCorp).
resultsIn random-effects meta-analyses, DOACs demonstrated a similar risk of stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.09-2.96), all-cause death (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.35-1.87), major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.24-1.39), and silent cerebral ischemia (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.64-1.58) when compared with warfarin.
conclusionsDOACs were similar to warfarin in the efficacy and safety profiles in patients with AF and concomitant significant MS. Future evidence is expected from other large trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.