Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014524›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2023

A study on the optimal condition of ground truth area for liver tumor detection in ultrasound images using deep learning.

Taisei Tosaki, Makoto Yamakawa, Tsuyoshi Shiina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Taisei TosakiGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Makoto YamakawaGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. makoto@shibaura-it.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-2719
Tsuyoshi ShiinaGraduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn recent years, efforts to apply artificial intelligence (AI) to the medical field have been growing. In general, a vast amount of high-quality training data is necessary to make great AI. For tumor detection AI, annotation quality is important. In diagnosis and detection of tumors using ultrasound images, humans use not only the tumor area but also the surrounding information, such as the back echo of the tumor. Therefore, we investigated changes in detection accuracy when changing the size of the region of interest (ROI, ground truth area) relative to liver tumors in the training data for the detection AI.

methodsWe defined D/L as the ratio of the maximum diameter (D) of the liver tumor to the ROI size (L). We created training data by changing the D/L value, and performed learning and testing with YOLOv3.

resultsOur results showed that the detection accuracy was highest when the training data were created with a D/L ratio between 0.8 and 1.0. In other words, it was found that the detection accuracy was improved by setting the ground true bounding box for detection AI training to be in contact with the tumor or slightly larger. We also found that when the D/L ratio was distributed in the training data, the wider the distribution, the lower the detection accuracy.

conclusionsTherefore, we recommend that the detector be trained with the D/L value close to a certain value between 0.8 and 1.0 for liver tumor detection from ultrasound images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLiver NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansUltrasonographyArtificial intelligenceDeep learningLiver tumor detectionUltrasound images

Identifiers

PMID37014524
PMCPMC10182112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.