Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014470›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2023

Diagnostic value of machine learning-based computed tomography texture analysis for differentiating multiple myeloma from osteolytic metastatic bone lesions in the peripheral skeleton.

Hakan Abdullah Özgül, Işıl Başara Akin, Uygar Mutlu, Ali Balci

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Associations between CT Radiomics Analyses and Hematopoietic Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: An Exploratory Analysis.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Present and Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hakan Abdullah ÖzgülDepartment of Radiology, Kemalpaşa State Hospital, Kırovası Küme Street, Kemalpaşa, 35730, Izmir, Turkey. haozgul@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6123-0668
Işıl Başara AkinDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.
Uygar MutluDepartment of Radiology, Yozgat State Hospital, Yozgat, Turkey.
Ali BalciDepartment of Radiology, Dokuz Eylul University, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo report the diagnostic performance of machine learning-based CT texture analysis for differentiating multiple myeloma from osteolytic metastatic bone lesions in the peripheral skeleton.

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated 172 patients with multiple myeloma (n = 70) and osteolytic metastatic bone lesions (n = 102) in the peripheral skeleton. Two radiologists individually used two-dimensional manual segmentation to extract texture features from non-contrast CT. In total, 762 radiomic features were extracted. Dimension reduction was performed in three stages: inter-observer agreement analysis, collinearity analysis, and feature selection. Data were randomly divided into training (n = 120) and test (n = 52) groups. Eight machine learning algorithms were used for model development. The primary performance metrics were the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy.

resultsIn total, 476 of the 762 texture features demonstrated excellent interobserver agreement. The number of features was reduced to 22 after excluding those with strong collinearity. Of these features, six were included in the machine learning algorithms using the wrapper-based classifier-specific technique. When all eight machine learning algorithms were considered for differentiating multiple myeloma from osteolytic metastatic bone lesions in the peripheral skeleton, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy were 0.776-0.932 and 78.8-92.3%, respectively. The k-nearest neighbors model performed the best, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy values of 0.902 and 92.3%, respectively.

conclusionMachine learning-based CT texture analysis is a promising method for discriminating multiple myeloma from osteolytic metastatic bone lesions.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsMultiple MyelomaDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesSkeletonTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone metastasis, Computed tomographyMachine learningMultiple myelomaTexture analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.