Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014462›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2023

Preoxygenation with standard facemask combining apnoeic oxygenation using high flow nasal cannula versuss standard facemask alone in patients with and without obesity: the OPTIMASK international study.

Samir Jaber, Audrey De Jong, Maximilian S Schaefer, Jiaqiang Zhang, Xiaowen Ma, Xinrui Hao, Shujing Zhou, Shang Lv, Valerie Banner-Goodspeed, Xiuhua Niu and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05495841 (OPTiMASK), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05495841 completednot on this map

OPTiMASK: Comparison of Pre-oxygenation With Standard Face Mask Combined With High Flow Nasal Oxygen With Pre-oxygenation With Standard Face Mask Alone

TypeobservationalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled80ConditionsSurgeryArmsPre-oxygenation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Preoxygenation in the ICU.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Samir JaberAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, 1; 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier cedex 5, Montpellier, France. s-jaber@chu-montpellier.fr.
Audrey De JongAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, 1; 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier cedex 5, Montpellier, France.
Maximilian S SchaeferCenter for Anesthesia Research Exellence, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Jiaqiang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xiaowen MaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xinrui HaoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Shujing ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shang LvDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Valerie Banner-GoodspeedCenter for Anesthesia Research Exellence, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Xiuhua NiuShenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. Mindray Building, Keji 12th Road South, High-tech Industrial Park, Nanshan, Shenzhen, 518057, People's Republic of China.
Thomas SfaraAnesthesiology and Intensive Care; Anesthesia and Critical Care Department B, Saint Eloi Teaching Hospital, PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, INSERM U1046, 1; 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, Montpellier cedex 5, Montpellier, France.
Daniel TalmorCenter for Anesthesia Research Exellence, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Henan Provincial People's Hospital · CNHarvard University · USIntensive Care Society · GBRenji Hospital · CNBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRMindray (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombining oxygen facemask with apnoeic oxygenation using high-flow-nasal-oxygen (HFNO) for preoxygenation in the operating room has not been studied against standard oxygen facemask alone. We hypothesized that facemask-alone would be associated with lower levels of lowest end-tidal oxygen (EtO2) within 2 min after intubation in comparison with facemask combined with HFNO.

methodsIn an international prospective before-after multicentre study, we included adult patients intubated in the operating room from September 2022 to December 2022. In the before period, preoxygenation was performed with facemask-alone, which was removed during laryngoscopy. In the after period, facemask combined with HFNO was used for preoxygenation and HFNO for apnoeic oxygenation during laryngoscopy. HFNO was maintained throughout intubation. The primary outcome was the lowest EtO2 within 2 min after intubation. The secondary outcome was SpO2 ≤ 95% within 2 min after intubation. Subgroup analyses were performed in patients without and with obesity. This study was registered 10 August 2022 with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05495841.

resultsA total of 450 intubations were evaluated, 233 with facemask-alone and 217 with facemask combined with HFNO. In all patients, the lowest EtO2 within 2 min after intubation was significantly lower with facemask-alone than with facemask combined with HFNO, 89 (85-92)% vs 91 (88-93)%, respectively (mean difference - 2.20(- 3.21 to - 1.18), p < 0.001). In patients with obesity, similar results were found [87(82-91)% vs 90(88-92)%, p = 0.004]; as in patients without obesity [90(86-92)% vs 91(89-93)%, p = 0.001)]. SpO2 ≤ 95% was more frequent with facemask-alone (14/232, 6%) than with facemask combined with HFNO (2/215, 1%, p = 0.004). No severe adverse events were recorded.

conclusionsCombining facemask with HFNO for preoxygenation and apnoeic oxygenation was associated with increased levels of lowest EtO2 within 2 min after intubation and less desaturation.

Indexed as

AnaesthesiaIntubationObesityOperating roomPreoxygenationVideolaryngoscope

Identifiers

PMID37014462
PMCPMC10073359
OpenAlexW4362521875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.