Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014427›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Thunderbeat®: a new step forward in transoral surgery-systematic review of literature and our experience.

Carmelo Saraniti, Verro Barbara

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carmelo SaranitiDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, ENT Clinic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy. carmelo.saraniti@unipa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1072-0736
Verro BarbaraDepartment of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostic, ENT Clinic, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1940-5281
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMinimally invasive surgery is today the main challenge of ENT surgeons who aim to achieve oncological radicality with less aesthetic and functional impact. This is the basis for the widespread transoral surgical techniques, as the Thunderbeat

objectiveTo date, the use of Thunderbeat

methodsThe research was carried out on Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane databases using specific keywords. Then, a retrospective study was carried out on 10 patients who underwent transoral surgery by Thunderbeat

resultsThe review included 3 articles that described transoral use of Thunderbeat

conclusionThis study demonstrated that Thunderbeat

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellLaryngeal NeoplasmsLarynxRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansHypopharynxMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeHead and neck cancerHead and neck surgeryOperative surgical proceduresSurgical instrumentsTransoral surgeryUltrasonic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID37014427
PMCPMC10220112
OpenAlexW4362522623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.