Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37014097›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2023

Real-World Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Results From an International Study.

Pedro C Barata, Andrea Leith, Amanda Ribbands, Rachel Montgomery, Matthew Last, Bhakti Arondekar, Jasmina Ivanova, Alexander Niyazov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro C BarataDepartment of Hematology Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8890-2951
Andrea LeithDepartment of Internal Medicine, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Amanda RibbandsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Rachel MontgomeryDepartment of Internal Medicine, Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Matthew LastDepartment of Internal Medicine, Formerly of Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK.
Bhakti ArondekarGlobal Value and Evidence, Oncology, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, USA.
Jasmina IvanovaGlobal Value and Evidence, Oncology, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Alexander NiyazovGlobal Value and Evidence, Oncology, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Adelphi Group (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited real-world evidence on how increasing use of treatment intensification in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has influenced treatment decisions in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The study objective was to evaluate the impact of novel hormonal therapy (NHT) and docetaxel use in mCSPC on first-line treatment patterns among patients with mCRPC in 5 European countries and the United States (US).

methodsPhysician-reported data on patients with mCRPC from the Adelphi Prostate Cancer Disease Specific Program were descriptively analyzed.

resultsA total of 215 physicians provided data on 722 patients with mCRPC. Across 5 European countries and the US, 65% and 75% of patients, respectively, received NHT, and 28% and 9% of patients, respectively, received taxane chemotherapy as first-line mCRPC treatment. In Europe, patients who had received NHT in mCSPC (n = 76) mostly received taxane chemotherapy in mCRPC (55%). Patients who had received taxane chemotherapy, or who did not receive taxane chemotherapy or NHT in mCSPC (n = 98 and 434, respectively) mostly received NHT in mCRPC (62% and 73%, respectively). In the US, patients who had received NHT, taxane chemotherapy, or neither in mCSPC (n = 32, 12, and 72, respectively) mostly received NHT in mCRPC (53%, 83%, and 83%, respectively). Two patients in Europe were rechallenged with the same NHT.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that physicians consider mCSPC treatment history when making first-line treatment decisions in mCRPC. Further studies are needed to better understand optimal treatment sequencing, especially as new treatments emerge.

Indexed as

Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrogen AntagonistsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBridged-Ring CompoundsDocetaxelHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTaxoidsTreatment OutcomeAndrogen AntagonistsBridged-Ring CompoundsDocetaxeltaxaneTaxoidsandrogen antagonistscastration-resistant/drug therapydisease managementprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37014097
PMCPMC10485288
OpenAlexW4362522398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.