Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37013991›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2023

Crystal structures and identification of novel Cd2+-specific DNA aptamer.

Hehua Liu, Yanqing Gao, Johnsi Mathivanan, Zev Armour-Garb, Zhiwei Shao, Yixi Zhang, Xin Zhao, Qiyuan Shao, Weizhen Zhang, Jie Yang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reconsidering Molecular Docking Practices in Aptamer Research.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hehua LiuShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Yanqing GaoShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Johnsi MathivananDepartment of Chemistry and The RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA.
Zev Armour-GarbDepartment of Chemistry and The RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA.
Zhiwei ShaoShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Yixi ZhangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xin ZhaoShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Qiyuan ShaoShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Weizhen ZhangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Jie YangShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Chulei CaoShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Huili LiShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Jia ShengDepartment of Chemistry and The RNA Institute, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12222, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6198-390X
Jianhua GanShanghai Public Health Clinical Center, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Genetics and Development, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-8852
Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center · CNAlbany State University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation CHE-1845486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) is one of the most toxic heavy metals. Exposure to Cd can impair the functions of the kidney, respiratory system, reproductive system and skeletal system. Cd2+-binding aptamers have been extensively utilized in the development of Cd2+-detecting devices; however, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. This study reports four Cd2+-bound DNA aptamer structures, representing the only Cd2+-specific aptamer structures available to date. In all the structures, the Cd2+-binding loop (CBL-loop) adopts a compact, double-twisted conformation and the Cd2+ ion is mainly coordinated with the G9, C12 and G16 nucleotides. Moreover, T11 and A15 within the CBL-loop form one regular Watson-Crick pair and stabilize the conformation of G9. The conformation of G16 is stabilized by the G8-C18 pair of the stem. By folding and/or stabilizing the CBL-loop, the other four nucleotides of the CBL-loop also play important roles in Cd2+ binding. Similarly to the native sequence, crystal structures, circular dichroism spectrum and isothermal titration calorimetry analysis confirm that several variants of the aptamer can recognize Cd2+. This study not only reveals the underlying basis for the binding of Cd2+ ions with the aptamer, but also extends the sequence for the construction of novel metal-DNA complex.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideCadmiumDNAMolecular ConformationAptamers, NucleotideCadmiumDNA

Identifiers

PMID37013991
PMCPMC10201416
OpenAlexW4362520910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.