Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37013533›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2023

Evaluation of the antibacterial activity of selected Kenyan medicinal plant extract combinations against clinically important bacteria.

Elizabeth A Odongo, Peggoty C Mutai, Beatrice K Amugune, Nelly N Mungai, Mary O Akinyi, Julia Kimondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tropical Almond Tree (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth A OdongoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Pharmaceutics & Pharmacognosy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya. lizzieodongo@gmail.com.
Peggoty C MutaiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Pharmaceutics & Pharmacognosy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Beatrice K AmuguneDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Pharmaceutics & Pharmacognosy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nelly N MungaiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Pharmaceutics & Pharmacognosy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 19676-00202, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mary O AkinyiDepartment of Pharmacy, Kenya Methodist University, P.O. Box 19676-00202, Meru, Kenya.
Julia KimondoDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture Technology, P.O. Box 62000- 00202, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfectious diseases are a major global public health concern as antimicrobial resistance (AMR) currently accounts for more than 700,000 deaths per year worldwide. The emergence and spread of resistant bacterial pathogens remain a key challenge in antibacterial chemotherapy. This study aims to investigate the antibacterial activity of combined extracts of various Kenyan medicinal plants against selected microorganisms of medical significance.

methodsThe antibacterial activity of various extract combinations of Aloe secundiflora, Toddalia asiatica, Senna didymobotrya and Camelia sinensis against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus was assessed using the agar well diffusion and the minimum inhibitory concentration in-vitro assays. The checkerboard method was used to evaluate the interactions between the various extract combinations. ANOVA test followed by Tukey's post hoc multiple comparison test was used to determine statistically significant differences in activity (P < 0.05).

resultsAt concentrations of 100 mg/ml (10,000 µg/well), the different combinations of the aqueous, methanol, dichloromethane and petroleum ether extracts of the selected Kenyan medicinal plants revealed diverse activity against all the test bacteria. The combination of methanolic C. sinensis and A. secundiflora was the most active against E. coli (14.17 ± 0.22 mm, diameter of zones of inhibition (DZI); MIC 2500 µg/well). The combination of methanolic C. sinensis and S. didymobotrya was the most active against S. aureus (16.43 ± 0.10 mm; MIC 1250 µg/well), K. pneumonia (14.93 ± 0.35 mm, DZI; MIC 1250 µg/well), P. aeruginosa (17.22 ± 0.41 mm, DZI; MIC 156.25 µg/well) and MRSA (19.91 ± 0.31 mm, DZI; MIC 1250 µg/well). The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration of the different plant extract combinations ranged from 10,000 µg/ well to 156.25 µg/well. The ANOVA test indicated statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between single extracts and their combinations. The fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICI) showed that the interactions were either synergistic (10.5%), additive (31.6%), indifferent (52.6%), or antagonistic (5.3%) for the selected combinations.

conclusionThis study findings validate the ethnopractice of selectively combining medicinal plants in the management of some bacterial infections in traditional medicine.

Indexed as

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusPlants, MedicinalAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaEscherichia coliKenyaPlant ExtractsStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsPlant ExtractsAntibacterialMedicinal plantsSynergisticTraditional medicine

Identifiers

PMID37013533
PMCPMC10069043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.