Trial reportKorean journal of anesthesiology2023
Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pericapsular nerve group block for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of analgesic techniques in total hip arthroplasty : a systematic review and network meta-analysis of more than 100 randomized studies incorporating minimal clinically important difference.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Analgesic and Functional Outcomes of the Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus the Quadratus Lumborum Block After Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pain research & management · 2026Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia following total hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Regional anaesthesia modalities for primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Pooled it
- Functional recovery and pain control following Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) block following hip surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- The role of the pericapsular nerve group block in early mobilisation and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy of different nerve block technologies for postoperative pain management in hip arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Comparison of Quadratus Lumborum Plus Modified Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Plus Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Block on Postoperative Analgesia and Functional Recovery in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Implementing Evidence-Based, Phase-Specific Multimodal Analgesia for Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Interprofessional Review for Nursing Practice and Management.Journal of nursing management · 2026Review
- Assessing the accuracy and educational value of YouTube videos on a novel regional anesthesia technique (PENG block).PloS one · 2026Article
- Efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block for pain control and functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Pericapsular nerve group block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block for hip surgery: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Total hip Arthroplasty.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Is pericapsular nerve group block superior to other regional analgesia techniques following total hip arthroplasty? a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2024Article
- Response to "Comment on Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial".Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Comment on "Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial".Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block or Wound Infiltration Combined with Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Postoperative Analgesia following Total Hip Arthroplasty through Posterior Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, quadratus lumborum block (QLB), and intra-articular (IA) local anesthetic injection have been shown to provide effective analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This randomized study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, motor protection, and quality of recovery associated with the PENG block, QLB, and IA injection.
methodsEighty-nine patients who underwent a unilateral primary THA under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to the PENG (n=30), QLB (n=30), or IA (n=29) group. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score over the first 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption, quadriceps and adductor muscle strength, and quality of recovery (QoR-40).
resultsThe dynamic (with movement) NRS scores at 3 and 6 h postoperatively were significantly lower in the PENG and QLB groups compared to the IA group (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The time to first opioid analgesia requirement was longer in the PENG and QLB groups than in the IA group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.016, respectively). A provided better preservation was found in the the PENG group than in the QLB group in terms of quadriceps muscle strength at 3 h postoperatively (P = 0.007) and time to mobilization (P = 0.003). No significant differences in the QoR-40 scores were seen.
conclusionsThe PENG and QLB groups showed similar analgesic effects and both showed more effective analgesia 6 h postoperatively than the IA group. All the groups showed similar postoperative quality of recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.