ReviewWorld neurosurgery: X2023
Themes in neuronavigation research: A machine learning topic analysis.
Review in World neurosurgery: X, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Highly Cited Artificial Intelligence Research Studies Published in Neurosurgical Journals: A Bibliometric Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven analysis identifies arthroscopic shoulder surgery, meniscus injury and treatment, and total knee arthroplasty design biomechanics as the most commonly published topics inJournal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Analysis Identifies Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Hip Arthroscopy and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome, and Shoulder Instability as the Most Commonly Published Topics in Arthroscopy.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Simplifying synthesis of the expanding glioblastoma literature: a topic modeling approach.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Article
- Exploiting Natural Language Processing to Unveil Topics and Trends of Traumatic Brain Injury Research.Neurotrauma reports · 2024Article
- Text classification technique for discovering country-based publications from international COVID-19 publications.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To understand trends in neuronavigation we employed machine learning methods to perform a broad literature review which would be impractical by manual inspection. Methods: PubMed was queried for articles with "Neuronavigation" in any field from inception-2020. Articles were designated neuronavigation-focused (NF) if "Neuronavigation" was a major MeSH. The latent dirichlet allocation topic modeling technique was used to identify themes of NF research. Results: There were 3896 articles of which 1727 (44%) were designated as NF. Between 1999-2009 and 2010-2020, the number of NF publications experienced 80% growth. Between 2009-2014 and 2015-2020, there was a 0.3% decline. Eleven themes covered 1367 (86%) NF articles. "Resection of Eloquent Lesions" comprised the highest number of articles (243), followed by "Accuracy and Registration" (242), "Patient Outcomes" (156), "Stimulation and Mapping" (126), "Planning and Visualization" (123), "Intraoperative Tools" (104), "Placement of Ventricular Catheters" (86), "Spine Surgery" (85), "New Systems" (80), "Guided Biopsies" (61), and "Surgical Approach" (61). All topics except for "Planning and Visualization", "Intraoperative Tools", and "New Systems" exhibited a monotonic positive trend. When analyzing subcategories, there were a greater number of clinical assessments or usage of existing neuronavigation systems (77%) rather than modification or development of new apparatuses (18%). Conclusion: NF research appears to focus on the clinical assessment of neuronavigation and to a lesser extent on the development of new systems. Although neuronavigation has made significant strides, NF research output appears to have plateaued in the last decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.