ArticleCJC open2023
Comparing the Effectiveness of 2 Cardiac Rehabilitation Exercise Therapy Programs.
Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Latin-American guidelines of recommendations at discharge from an acute coronary syndrome.Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico · 2024Guideline
- Hybrid Cardiac Rehabilitation as an Optimal Strategy for Post-MI Recovery: A 14-Week Prospective Study on Clinical and Functional Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rationale and design of APOLLO: a personalized rehAbilitation PrOgram in aLLOgeneic bone marrow transplantation.BMC cancer · 2025Observational
- Cardiac Rehabilitation After Open Heart Surgery: A Narrative Systematic Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in Canada, highlighting the critical role of disease prevention and risk reduction programs. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a key component of comprehensive cardiovascular care. Currently, more than 200 CR programs are established across the country, varying in duration, number of in-person supervised exercise sessions, and recommendations for exercise frequency at-home. In an increasingly cost-conscious healthcare environment, the effectiveness of healthcare services must be consistently reevaluated. This study evaluates the impact of 2 CR programs implemented by the Northern Alberta Cardiac Rehabilitation Program, by comparing peak metabolic equivalents achieved by study participants in each program. We hypothesize that our "hybrid" CR program, which is structured as an 8-week program with weekly in-person exercise sessions and a prescribed home exercise program, has patient outcomes similar to those of our "traditional" CR program, which required biweekly in-person exercise sessions over the course of 5 weeks. The results of this study may have implications for evaluating how to minimize barriers to both rehabilitation participation and long-term effectiveness of CR programs. The results may help inform the structuring and funding of future rehabilitation programs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.