ArticleCJC open2023
Apixaban in Patients With Post-Myocardial Infarction Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Position Paper of the Italian Society of Hemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET).Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Guideline
- Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin in left ventricular thrombus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a pilot trial and a prespecified meta-analysis of randomised trials.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Pooled it
- DOACs vs Warfarin for Post-myocardial Infarction Left Ventricular Thrombus: A GRADE-assessed Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Trials.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Review of Efficacy and Safety.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The role of aetiology in determining anticoagulation effectiveness for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2026Observational
- From heart to brain: a Case Report of individualized antithrombotic management for left ventricular thrombus and stroke in a young patient with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for left ventricular thrombus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Anticoagulation Strategies for Left Ventricular Thrombus After Myocardial Infarction: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Comparison of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of left ventricular thrombi: a retrospective cohort study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Direct Oral Anticoagulants Against Warfarin for Left Ventricular Thrombus Resolution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- The Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin for Left Ventricular Thrombus Resolution.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Left Ventricular Thrombosis in Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathies: Focus on Evidence-Based Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Efficacy and safety of off-label direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin for left ventricular thrombus: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Oral anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024Article
- Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in treatment of left ventricular thrombus- a meta-analysis update.Thrombosis journal · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants are frequently used to treat post-myocardial infarction (MI) left ventricular thrombus (LVT). This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of use of apixaban, compared to the standard warfarin therapy, in post-MI LVT. Methods: This open-label, randomized controlled trial included patients with post-acute or recent anterior wall MI with transthoracic echocardiography-confirmed LVT. Patients were randomized to receive either apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin to achieve an international normalized ratio of 2-3, in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary endpoint was LVT resolution at 3 months, with a noninferiority margin of 95% for apixaban compared to warfarin. The secondary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or any relevant bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) classification. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled from 3 centres. The use of dual or single antiplatelet agents was similar in the 2 groups. The number of 1-, 3-, and 6-month LVT resolutions were 10 (40.0%), 19 (76.0%), and 23 (92.0%) in the apixaban group, and 14 (56%), 20 (80.0%), and 24 (96.0%) in the warfarin group, respectively, without significant differences ( Conclusions: Apixaban was not inferior to warfarin in the resolution of post-MI LVT.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.