ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2023
Unusual cause of retroperitoneal hemorrhage: Acute deep vein thrombosis.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spontaneous Iliac Vein Ruptures: A Systematic Review.Vascular and endovascular surgery · 2023Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retroperitoneal hemorrhage is rarely associated with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We present a case of retroperitoneal hemorrhage due to disruption of the external iliac vein associated with acute DVT, which was carefully treated with an anticoagulant. A 78-year-old woman complained of acute abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed left retroperitoneal hematoma and venous thrombosis from just above the bifurcation of the inferior vena cava to the left femoral vein. She was admitted for conservative treatment without an anticoagulant. The next day, she developed pulmonary embolism (PE), but administration of an anticoagulant was not started because of the possibility of rebleeding. Forty-four hours after the onset of PE, unfractionated heparin was administrated intravenously. After initiation of anticoagulation, retroperitoneal hemorrhage did not expand and PE did not get worse. Follow-up contrast-enhanced CT suggested May-Thurner syndrome (MTS). She was uneventfully discharged home on the 35th day with oral warfarin. Retroperitoneal hemorrhage is rarely caused by acute DVT in the case of potential causes such as MTS. In such cases, the timing of initiation of anticoagulation is difficult considering the possibility of rebleeding from retroperitoneal hemorrhage. We should start anticoagulation based on both the state of hemostatic and preventive procedures for PE. Learning objective: Retroperitoneal hemorrhage is rarely caused by acute deep vein thrombosis because of the iliac vein rupture. The subsequent occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE) makes it more complicated and critical because treatment strategies for these two conditions are the opposite: hemostasis versus anticoagulation. The initiation of administration of an anticoagulant should be determined based on status of patients, the procedures of hemostasis, and prevention of PE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.