Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012540›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2023

Evaluation of a sterile, filter-based, in-house method for rapid direct bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using positive blood culture.

Keun Ju Kim, Seung Gyu Yun, Yunjung Cho, Myung-Hyun Nam, Young Jin Ko, Chang Kyu Lee

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keun Ju KimDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2548-5609
Seung Gyu YunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9915-9681
Yunjung ChoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-8385
Myung-Hyun NamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8737-6902
Young Jin KoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.
Chang Kyu LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. cklee5381@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7528-7833
Korea University · KRChosun University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the performance of our in-house method for rapid direct bacterial identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) using a positive blood culture (BC) broth. For Gram-negative bacteria, 4 mL of BC broth was aspirated and passed through a Sartorius Minisart syringe filter with a pore size of 5 µm. The filtrate was then centrifuged and washed. A small volume of the pellet was used for ID, using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and for AST, using automated broth microdilution. For Gram-positive cocci, 4 mL of BC broth was passed through the Minisart syringe filter. Then, 4 mL of sterile distilled water was injected in the direction opposite to that of the filtration to collect the bacterial residue trapped in the filter. Compared with the conventional method performed with pure colonies on agar plates, 94.0% (234/249) were correctly identified using the in-house method, with rates of 91.4% (127/139) and 97.3% (107/110) for Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates, respectively. Of 234 correctly identified isolates, 230 were assessed by AST. Categorical agreement and essential agreement were 93.3% and 94.5%, respectively, with a minor error rate of 3.8%, a major error rate of 3.4%, and a very major error rate of 1.6%. Our in-house preparation method showed good performance in rapid direct ID and AST using positive BC broths compared to the conventional method. This simple method can shorten the conventional turnaround time for ID and AST by at least 1 day, potentially contributing to better patient management.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacteriaBlood CultureGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial susceptibility testingBlood cultureDirect identificationFiltrationIn-house method

Identifiers

PMID37012540
OpenAlexW4362521169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.