Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012389›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Grazing-incidence diffraction reveals cellulose and pectin organization in hydrated plant primary cell wall.

Joshua T Del Mundo, Sintu Rongpipi, Hui Yang, Dan Ye, Sarah N Kiemle, Stephanie L Moffitt, Charles L Troxel, Michael F Toney, Chenhui Zhu, James D Kubicki and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. High Ionic Seebeck Effect in Natural Leaves.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Structure and growth of plant cell walls.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua T Del MundoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sintu RongpipiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Hui YangDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Dan YeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sarah N KiemleDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Stephanie L MoffittSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Charles L TroxelSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Michael F ToneyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering and the Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7513-1166
Chenhui ZhuAdvanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
James D KubickiDepartment of Earth, Environmental and Resource Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, 79968, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9277-9044
Daniel J CosgroveDepartment of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Esther W GomezDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. ewg10@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2082-013X
Enrique D GomezDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. edg12@psu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8942-4480
Pennsylvania State University · USSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USThe University of Texas at El Paso · USUniversity of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary cell wall is highly hydrated in its native state, yet many structural studies have been conducted on dried samples. Here, we use grazing-incidence wide-angle X-ray scattering (GIWAXS) with a humidity chamber, which enhances scattering and the signal-to-noise ratio while keeping outer onion epidermal peels hydrated, to examine cell wall properties. GIWAXS of hydrated and dried onion reveals that the cellulose ([Formula: see text]) lattice spacing decreases slightly upon drying, while the (200) lattice parameters are unchanged. Additionally, the ([Formula: see text]) diffraction intensity increases relative to (200). Density functional theory models of hydrated and dry cellulose microfibrils corroborate changes in crystalline properties upon drying. GIWAXS also reveals a peak that we attribute to pectin chain aggregation. We speculate that dehydration perturbs the hydrogen bonding network within cellulose crystals and collapses the pectin network without affecting the lateral distribution of pectin chain aggregates.

Indexed as

CellulosePectinsCell MembraneCell WallIncidencePlantsX-Ray DiffractionCellulosePectins

Identifiers

PMID37012389
PMCPMC10070456
OpenAlexW4362523272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.