Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Food system actor perspectives on future-proofing European food systems through plant breeding.

S Stetkiewicz, J Menary, A Nair, M Rufino, A R H Fischer, M Cornelissen, A Guichaoua, P Jorasch, S Lemarié, A K Nanda and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

S StetkiewiczLancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, Lancashire, UK. stacia.stetkiewicz@nottingham.ac.uk.
J MenaryLancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, Lancashire, UK.
A NairMarketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M RufinoLancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, Lancashire, UK.
A R H FischerMarketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Wageningen University, 6700 EW, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
M CornelissenBASF Innovation Center Gent, 9052, Gent, Belgium.
A GuichaouaACTA -The Agricultural Technical Institutes, 75595, Paris, France.
P JoraschEuroseeds, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
S LemariéUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, INRA, Grenoble INP, 38400, Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France.
A K Nanda'Plants for the Future' European Technology Platform, 1000, Brussels, Belgium.
R WilhelmFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany.
J A C DaviesLancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YX, Lancashire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop improvement is a key innovation area in the pursuit of sustainable food systems. However, realising its potential requires integration of the needs and priorities of all agri-food chain stakeholders. In this study, we provide a multi-stakeholder perspective on the role of crop improvement in future-proofing the European food system. We engaged agri-business, farm- and consumer-level stakeholders, and plant scientists through an online survey and focus groups. Four of each group's top five priorities were shared and related to environmental sustainability goals (water, nitrogen and phosphorus efficiency, and heat stress). Consensus was identified on issues including considering existing alternatives to plant breeding (e.g. management strategies), minimising trade-offs, and addressing geographical variation in needs. We conducted a rapid evidence synthesis on the impacts of priority crop improvement options, highlighting the urgent need for further research examining downstream sustainability impacts to identify concrete targets for plant breeding innovation as a food systems solution.

Indexed as

Plant BreedingFarmsFocus Groups

Identifiers

PMID37012265
PMCPMC10069723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.