Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012259›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2023

Meat food fraud risk in Chinese markets 2012-2021.

Xiaoman Li, Mingwu Zang, Dan Li, Kaihua Zhang, Zheqi Zhang, Shouwei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoman LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Meat Processing Technology, China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, 100068, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5625-6724
Mingwu ZangBeijing Key Laboratory of Meat Processing Technology, China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, 100068, Beijing, China. zangmw@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1302-316X
Dan LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Meat Processing Technology, China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, 100068, Beijing, China.
Kaihua ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Meat Processing Technology, China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, 100068, Beijing, China.
Zheqi ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Meat Processing Technology, China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, 100068, Beijing, China.
Shouwei WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Meat Processing Technology, China Meat Research Center, Beijing Academy of Food Sciences, 100068, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food fraud is a major concern worldwide, and the majority of cases include meat adulteration or fraud. Many incidences of food fraud have been identified for meat products both in China and abroad over the last decade. We created a meat food fraud risk database compiled from 1987 pieces of information recorded by official circular information and media reports in China from 2012 to 2021. The data covered livestock, poultry, by-products, and various processed meat products. We conducted a summary analysis of meat food fraud incidents by researching fraud types, regional distribution, adulterants and categories involved, categories and sub-categories of foods, risk links and locations, etc. The findings can be used not only to analyze meat food safety situations and study the burden of food fraud but also help to promote the efficiency of detection and rapid screening, along with improving prevention and regulation of adulteration in the meat supply chain markets.

Identifiers

PMID37012259
PMCPMC10070328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.