Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012257›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2023

Pharmacological management of acute spinal cord injury: a longitudinal multi-cohort observational study.

Catherine R Jutzeler, Lucie Bourguignon, Bobo Tong, Elias Ronca, Eric Bailey, Noam Y Harel, Fred Geisler, Adam R Ferguson, Brian K Kwon, Jacquelyn J Cragg and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. An update on spinal cord injury and diaphragm neuromotor control.Expert review of respiratory medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Catherine R Jutzeler *Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland. Catherine.Jutzeler@hest.ethz.ch.
Lucie Bourguignon *Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Lengghalde 2, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Bobo TongInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Elias RoncaSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.
Eric BaileyJames J Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Noam Y HarelJames J Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Fred GeislerUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Adam R FergusonBrain and Spinal Injury Center, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA.
Brian K KwonInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jacquelyn J CraggInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Lukas GrassnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
John L K KramerInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
ETH Zurich · CHInternational Collaboration On Repair Discoveries · CAJames J. Peters VA Medical Center · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAInnsbruck Medical University · ATSwiss Paraplegic Research · CHUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple types and classes of medications are administered in the acute management of traumatic spinal cord injury. Prior clinical studies and evidence from animal models suggest that several of these medications could modify (i.e., enhance or impede) neurological recovery. We aimed to systematically determine the types of medications commonly administered, alone or in combination, in the transition from acute to subacute spinal cord injury. For that purpose, type, class, dosage, timing, and reason for administration were extracted from two large spinal cord injury datasets. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the medications administered within the first 60 days after spinal cord injury. Across 2040 individuals with spinal cord injury, 775 unique medications were administered within the two months after injury. On average, patients enrolled in a clinical trial were administered 9.9 ± 4.9 (range 0-34), 14.3 ± 6.3 (range 1-40), 18.6 ± 8.2 (range 0-58), and 21.5 ± 9.7 (range 0-59) medications within the first 7, 14, 30, and 60 days post-injury, respectively. Those enrolled in an observational study were administered on average 1.7 ± 1.7 (range 0-11), 3.7 ± 3.7 (range 0-24), 8.5 ± 6.3 (range 0-42), and 13.5 ± 8.3 (range 0-52) medications within the first 7, 14, 30, and 60 days post-injury, respectively. Polypharmacy was commonplace (up to 43 medications per day per patient). Approximately 10% of medications were administered acutely as prophylaxis (e.g., against the development of pain or infections). To our knowledge, this was the first time acute pharmacological practices have been comprehensively examined after spinal cord injury. Our study revealed a high degree of polypharmacy in the acute stages of spinal cord injury, raising the potential to impact neurological recovery. All results can be interactively explored on the R

Indexed as

Spinal Cord InjuriesCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesPainRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord

Identifiers

PMID37012257
PMCPMC10070428
OpenAlexW4362523929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.