Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012149›Full record

ArticleTherapie

Pharmacovigilance signals from active surveillance of mRNA platform vaccines (tozinameran and elasomeran).

Marie-Blanche Valnet-Rabier, Martine Tebacher, Sophie Gautier, Joelle Micallef, Francesco Salvo, Antoine Pariente, Haleh Bagheri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent Advances in Aptamer-Based Applications in Cardiology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Target, silence, replace: a review on RNA-based drugs in modern medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marie-Blanche Valnet-RabierCentre de pharmacovigilance Franche-Comté, CHU de Besançon, 25000 Besançon, France.
Martine TebacherCentre de pharmacovigilance de Strasbourg, hôpitaux universitaires de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Sophie GautierCentre de pharmacovigilance Nord pas de Calais, service de pharmacologie médicale, CHU, 59000 Lille, France.
Joelle MicallefCentre de pharmacovigilance de Marseille, service de pharmacologie clinique et pharmacovigilance, AMU, APHM, 13000 Marseille, France.
Francesco SalvoUniversité de Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH, U1219, Team AHeaD, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Service de pharmacologie médicale, centre de pharmacovigilance de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Antoine ParienteUniversité de Bordeaux, Inserm, BPH, U1219, Team AHeaD, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Service de pharmacologie médicale, centre de pharmacovigilance de Bordeaux, CHU de Bordeaux, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Haleh BagheriService de pharmacologie médicale, CIC1436, Centre de pharmacovigilance de Toulouse, CHU Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France. Electronic address: haleh.bagheri@univ-tlse3.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwo severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, tozinameran/BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®, Pfizer-BioNTech) and elasomeran/mRNA-1273 (Spikevax®, Moderna), were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) at the end of 2020, less than a year after the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In France, the health authorities have requested an intensive vaccination campaign, accompanied by a reinforced and active pharmacovigilance surveillance. This surveillance and analysis of real-life data, based on spontaneous reports received by the French Network of Regional PharmacoVigilance Centers (RFCRPV), has enabled to identify numerous pharmacovigilance signals. Some of them, such as myocarditis and heavy menstrual bleeding, have been confirmed as adverse effects of these vaccines.

methodWe propose a descriptive review of the main pharmacovigilance signals identified by the RFCRPV concerning vaccines from the mRNA platform.

resultsMost pharmacovigilance signals were common to both mRNA vaccines: myocarditis, menstrual disorders, acquired haemophilia, Parsonage-Turner syndrome, rhizomelic pseudo-polyarthritis and hearing disorders. Other signals were more specific, such as arterial hypertension with tozinameran or delayed reaction site injection with elasomeran.

conclusionThis non-exhaustive review illustrates the experience of RFCRPV in identifying and monitoring pharmacovigilance signals related to mRNA vaccines in France during the COVID-19 pandemics, and the crucial role of pharmacological and clinical expertise in this area. It also highlights the predominant contribution of spontaneous reporting in the generation of pharmacovigilance signals, particularly for serious and rare adverse events not detected before marketing.

Indexed as

2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19PharmacovigilanceAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle Aged2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273BNT162 VaccineAdverse drug reactionsElasomeranPharmacovigilanceRNAm vaccinesTozinameran

Identifiers

PMID37012149
PMCPMC10007713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.