Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012012›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Diagnostic performance of two teledentistry tools in elderly care facilities: the ONE-1 protocol for a pilot prospective diagnostic study.

Thomas Veynachter, Yelda Sural, Patrick Baudot, Thomas Remen, Alexandre Baudet, Bernard Kabuth, Celine Clement

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05089214 (Diagnostic Efficacy Assessment of Two Oral Telemedicine Tools Compared to Intra Oral Clinical Examination Used as a Reference), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05089214 naunknown statusnot on this map

Diagnostic Efficacy Assessment of Two Oral Telemedicine Tools Compared to Intra Oral Clinical Examination Used as a Reference: a Pilot Study in Region Grand-Est

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Hospital, Nancy, FranceRan2022 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsDental Decay, Periodontal Abscess, Periodontitis, GingivitisArmsIntra oral cameras
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas Veynachter *Interpsy Research Unit, UR 4432, Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
Yelda Sural *CHRU Nancy, University Hospital, Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
Patrick BaudotOHS Lorraine, Flavigny-sur-Moselle, France.
Thomas RemenCHRU Nancy, Unit of Methodology, Data Management and Statistic, Nancy University Hospital, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Alexandre BaudetCHRU Nancy, Department of Public Health Dentistry, University Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2905-0530
Bernard KabuthInterpsy Research Unit, UR 4432, Lorraine University, Nancy, France.
Celine ClementInterpsy Research Unit, UR 4432, Lorraine University, Nancy, France celine.clement@univ-lorraine.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-0208
Interpsy · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElderly people living in care facilities suffer from difficulties in accessing preventive and curative dental care. This leads to poor oral health, which is an increased risk of systemic diseases, in a fragile and dependent population. All this contributes to a progressive loss of autonomy and a decreased quality of life. The use of information and communication technologies through oral telemedicine could help to overcome these barriers. We described the protocol for evaluating the diagnostic performance of two intraoral cameras against a gold standard clinical examination. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We conduct a pilot multicentric and prospective diagnostic study (a minimal-risk, minimal-burden interventional research called ONE-1 (for Oral graNd Est step 1)) on two intraoral diagnostic tools (Soprocare camera and consumer camera) compared with a reference intraoral examination. Patients in four elderly care facilities will be included, with randomisation of participant selection and randomisation of the order of the three intraoral examinations performed by a dental surgeon. We will evaluate the diagnostic performance of each device with the asynchronous analysis of videos by two independent dental surgeons against the clinical gold standard examination performed by a single, third dental examiner. The primary outcome is the presence of at least one tooth decay in the dentition of each study participant. Second, we will evaluate the presence of other dental or oral diseases, and the time required to perform each examination. Finally, we will evaluate the organisation of patient follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the French ethics committee (Protection to Persons Committee, Nord-Ouest IV on 9 June 2021 and on 28 November 2022). Results will be disseminated through conferences' presentations and publications in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05089214.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTelemedicineAgedHumansOral HealthPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesORAL MEDICINEPublic healthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37012012
PMCPMC10083750
OpenAlexW4362523820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.