Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37012003›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open quality2023

Barriers and facilitators to improving patient safety learning systems: a systematic review of qualitative studies and meta-synthesis.

Hassan Assem Mahmoud, Kednapa Thavorn, Sunita Mulpuru, Daniel McIsaac, Mohamed A Abdelrazek, Amr Assem Mahmoud, Alan J Forster

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open quality, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hassan Assem MahmoudEpidemiology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada dr.hassanassem@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3139-5829
Kednapa ThavornEpidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-8447
Sunita MulpuruRespirology, Ottawa Hospital General Campus, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel McIsaacClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mohamed A AbdelrazekRadiology Department, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Amr Assem MahmoudPublic Health and Community Medicine, Cairo University Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Alan J ForsterClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2942-2891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation and continuous improvement of patient safety learning systems (PSLS) is a principal strategy for mitigating preventable harm to patients. Although substantial efforts have sought to improve these systems, there is a need to more comprehensively understand critical success factors. This study aims to summarise the barriers and facilitators perceived by hospital staff and physicians to influence the reporting, analysis, learning and feedback within PSLS in hospitals.

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-synthesis by searching MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science. We included English-language manuscripts of qualitative studies evaluating effectiveness of the PSLS and excluded studies evaluating specific individual adverse events, such as systems for tracking only medication side effects, for example. We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for qualitative systematic reviews.

resultsWe extracted data from 22 studies, after screening 2475 for inclusion/exclusion criteria. The included studies focused on reporting aspects of the PSLS, however, there were important barriers and facilitators across the analysis, learning and feedback phases. We identified the following barriers for effective use of PSLS: inadequate organisational support with shortage of resources, lack of training, weak safety culture, lack of accountability, defective policies, blame and a punitive environment, complex system, lack of experience and lack of feedback. We identified the following enabling factors: continuous training, a balance between accountability and responsibility, leaders as role models, anonymous reporting, user-friendly systems, well-structured analysis teams, tangible improvement.

conclusionMultiple barriers and facilitators to uptake of PSLS exist. These factors should be considered by decision makers seeking to enhance the impact of PSLS. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No formal ethical approval or consent were required as no primary data were collected.

Indexed as

LearningPatient SafetyHumansHealthcare quality improvementIncident reportingMedication safetyNear missPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID37012003
PMCPMC10083845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.