Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37011614›Full record

ReviewSeminars in musculoskeletal radiology2023

Anatomical Variants of the Upper Limb Nerves: Clinical and Preoperative Relevance.

Christoph Schwabl, Romed Hörmann, Carola Johanna Strolz, Elena Drakonaki, Robert Zimmermann, Andrea Sabine Klauser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nerve anastomoses in the upper limb: an up-to-date meta-analysis.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christoph SchwablRadiology Department, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4438-9025
Romed HörmannDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Carola Johanna StrolzRadiology Department, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Elena DrakonakiIndependent MSK Radiology Practice, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Robert ZimmermannDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital for Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Andrea Sabine KlauserRadiology Department, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Profound knowledge of nerve variations is essential for clinical practice. It is crucial for interpreting the large variability of a patient's clinical presentation and the different mechanisms of nerve injury. Awareness of nerve variations facilitates surgical safety and efficacy. Clinically significant anatomical variations can be classified into two main groups: variability in the course of the nerve and variability of structures surrounding the nerve. In this review article we focus on the most common nerve variants of the upper extremity and their clinical relevance.

Indexed as

Peripheral NervesUpper ExtremityAnatomic VariationHumans

Identifiers

PMID37011614
PMCPMC10069954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.