Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37011596›Full record

ArticleObesity facts2023

Higher Risk of Sarcopenia in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: NHANES 1999-2018.

Siyu Dai, Dingbo Shu, Fanjing Meng, Yajiao Chen, Jianping Wang, Xiaochen Liu, Xiangyue Xiao, Wentong Guo, Feng Chen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity facts, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06337357 (Evaluating Resistance Training for Sarcopenia in Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06337357 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Resistance Training for Sarcopenia in Older Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Treatment Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Geriatric HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsSarcopenia, DiabetesArmsProgressive Resistance Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Association between daily sitting time and sarcopenia in the US population: a cross-sectional study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Siyu DaiSchool of Clinical Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Dingbo ShuDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang University Shaoxing Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Fanjing MengSchool of Clinical Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Yajiao ChenDepartment of Vascular Surgery Nursing, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences and Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Jianping WangDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang University Shaoxing Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaochen LiuSchool of Basic Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiangyue XiaoSchool of Basic Medicine, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Wentong GuoDepartment of Computer Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, China.
Feng ChenFaculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, China.
Hangzhou Normal University · CNShaoxing People's Hospital · CNChinese University of Hong Kong · HKCity University of Hong Kong · HKSichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent studies suggested that sarcopenia may be a significant comorbidity of diabetes mellitus (DM). Nonetheless, studies with nationally representative data are scarce, and the changing trend of sarcopenia prevalence over time is largely unknown. Therefore, we aimed to estimate and compare the prevalence of sarcopenia in diabetic and nondiabetic US older population, and to explore the potential predictors of sarcopenia as well as the trend of sarcopenia prevalent in the past decades.

methodsData were retrieved from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Sarcopenia and DM were defined according to corresponding diagnosis criteria. Weighted prevalence was calculated and compared between diabetic and nondiabetic participants. The differences among age and ethnicity groups were explored.

resultsA total of 6,381 US adults (>50 years) were involved. The overall prevalence of sarcopenia was 17.8% for US elders, and the prevalence was higher (27.9% vs. 15.7%) in those with diabetes ones than those without. Stepwise regression revealed that sarcopenia was significantly associated with DM (adjusted odds ratio = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.08-1.22; p < 0.05) after controlling for potential confounders including gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, BMI, and muscle strengthening activity. A slight fluctuation but overall increasing trend of sarcopenia prevalence was observed among diabetic elders, while no obvious changing trend was observed in their counterparts in recent decades.

conclusionDiabetic US older adults face significantly higher risk of sarcopenia when compared with their nondiabetic counterparts. Gender, age, ethnicity, educational level, and obesity were important influencing factors of sarcopenia development.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2SarcopeniaAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysObesityPrevalenceRisk FactorsUnited StatesDiabetes mellitusOlder adultsPrevalenceSarcopeniaTrend

Identifiers

PMID37011596
PMCPMC10826600
OpenAlexW4362521753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.