Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37011273›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

A Tea Buds Counting Method Based on YOLOv5 and Kalman Filter Tracking Algorithm.

Yang Li, Rong Ma, Rentian Zhang, Yifan Cheng, Chunwang Dong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
20.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yang LiKey Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Rong MaCollege of Optical, Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Rentian ZhangKey Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Yifan ChengKey Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Chunwang DongKey Laboratory of Tea Quality and Safety Control, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNMinistry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs · CNZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tea yield estimation provides information support for the harvest time and amount and serves as a decision-making basis for farmer management and picking. However, the manual counting of tea buds is troublesome and inefficient. To improve the efficiency of tea yield estimation, this study presents a deep-learning-based approach for efficiently estimating tea yield by counting tea buds in the field using an enhanced YOLOv5 model with the Squeeze and Excitation Network. This method combines the Hungarian matching and Kalman filtering algorithms to achieve accurate and reliable tea bud counting. The effectiveness of the proposed model was demonstrated by its mean average precision of 91.88% on the test dataset, indicating that it is highly accurate at detecting tea buds. The model application to the tea bud counting trials reveals that the counting results from test videos are highly correlated with the manual counting results (

Identifiers

PMID37011273
PMCPMC10062705
OpenAlexW4321458585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.