Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37011191›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Elephants as an animal model for self-domestication.

Limor Raviv, Sarah L Jacobson, Joshua M Plotnik, Jacob Bowman, Vincent Lynch, Antonio Benítez-Burraco

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The domestication of the larynx: The neural crest connection.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.

Limor RavivThe Language Evolution and Adaptation in Diverse Situations (LEADS) Group, Language & Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 6525 XD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-3553
Sarah L JacobsonDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0002-3439-1965
Joshua M PlotnikDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY 10016.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-8818
Jacob BowmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo The State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, NY 14260-4610.
Vincent LynchDepartment of Biological Sciences, University at Buffalo The State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, NY 14260-4610.
Antonio Benítez-BurracoDepartment of Spanish, Linguistics, and Theory of Literature, University of Seville 41004 Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4574-5666
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans are unique in their sophisticated culture and societal structures, their complex languages, and their extensive tool use. According to the human self-domestication hypothesis, this unique set of traits may be the result of an evolutionary process of self-induced domestication, in which humans evolved to be less aggressive and more cooperative. However, the only other species that has been argued to be self-domesticated besides humans so far is bonobos, resulting in a narrow scope for investigating this theory limited to the primate order. Here, we propose an animal model for studying self-domestication: the elephant. First, we support our hypothesis with an extensive cross-species comparison, which suggests that elephants indeed exhibit many of the features associated with self-domestication (e.g., reduced aggression, increased prosociality, extended juvenile period, increased playfulness, socially regulated cortisol levels, and complex vocal behavior). Next, we present genetic evidence to reinforce our proposal, showing that genes positively selected in elephants are enriched in pathways associated with domestication traits and include several candidate genes previously associated with domestication. We also discuss several explanations for what may have triggered a self-domestication process in the elephant lineage. Our findings support the idea that elephants, like humans and bonobos, may be self-domesticated. Since the most recent common ancestor of humans and elephants is likely the most recent common ancestor of all placental mammals, our findings have important implications for convergent evolution beyond the primate taxa, and constitute an important advance toward understanding how and why self-domestication shaped humans' unique cultural niche.

Indexed as

ElephantsAnimalsDomesticationFemaleHumansModels, AnimalPan paniscusPlacentaPregnancycross-species comparisonselephantsevolutionprosocialityself-domestication

Identifiers

PMID37011191
PMCPMC10104499
OpenAlexW4362521122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.