Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37010964›Full record

ReviewSurgical infections2023

Gut Microbiome in Sepsis.

Nathan J Klingensmith, Craig M Coopersmith

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical infections, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Indole-3-carboxaldehyde fromGut microbes · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Future directions in sepsis research.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Claudin-2 upregulation enhances intestinal permeability, immune activation, dysbiosis, and mortality in sepsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan J KlingensmithDepartment of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Craig M CoopersmithDepartment of Surgery and Emory Critical Care Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Intestinal Integrity in Sepsis and ShockR01GM072808 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COOPERSMITH, CRAIG M · 2005 to 2021
$5.1M
The Impact of Cancer on the Pathophysiology of SepsisR01GM104323 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI COOPERSMITH, CRAIG M, FORD, MANDY L · 2013 to 2021
$2.4M
The Gut as a Target to Improve Outcomes in SepsisR35GM148217 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Craig M Coopersmith · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072808NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104323NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM148217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsSepsisBacteriaHumansIntestinal MucosaPrebioticsPrebioticsgutintestinemicrobiomepathobiomeprobioticssepsis

Identifiers

PMID37010964
PMCPMC10061326
OpenAlexW4362520917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.