ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Differentiation of Bone Metastasis in Elderly Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bibliometric analysis of bone metastases from lung cancer research from 2004 to 2023.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Enhancing clinical training evaluation: leveraging artificial intelligence algorithms for effective online practicum assessment.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Bone Metastasis Management: A Narrative Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Bone scintigraphy based on deep learning model and modified growth optimizer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Detection, Management, and Prognosis of Bone Metastasis: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe tested the performance of general machine learning and joint machine learning algorithms in the classification of bone metastasis, in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.
methodsWe used R version 3.5.3 for statistical analysis of the general information, and Python to construct machine learning models.
resultsWe first used the average classifiers of the 4 machine learning algorithms to rank the features and the results showed that race, sex, whether they had surgery and marriage were the first 4 factors affecting bone metastasis. Machine learning results in the training group: for area under the curve (AUC), except for RF and LR, the AUC values of all machine learning classifiers were greater than .8, but the joint algorithm did not improve the AUC for any single machine learning algorithm. Among the results related to accuracy and precision, the accuracy of other machine learning classifiers except the RF algorithm was higher than 70%, and only the precision of the LGBM algorithm was higher than 70%. Machine learning results in the test group: Similarly, for areas under the curve (AUC), except RF and LR, the AUC values for all machine learning classifiers were greater than .8, but the joint algorithm did not improve the AUC value for any single machine learning algorithm. For accuracy, except for the RF algorithm, the accuracy of other machine learning classifiers was higher than 70%. The highest precision for the LGBM algorithm was .675.
conclusionThe results of this concept verification study show that machine learning algorithm classifiers can distinguish the bone metastasis of patients with lung cancer. This will provide a new research idea for the future use of non-invasive technology to identify bone metastasis in lungcancer. However, more prospective multicenter cohort studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.