Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37010850›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Differentiation of Bone Metastasis in Elderly Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms.

Cheng-Mao Zhou, Ying Wang, Qiong Xue, Yu Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Mao ZhouPerioperative Medical Big Data Research Group, Department of Anaesthesiology, 637250Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5680-791X
Ying WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Qiong XueDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, 191599First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yu ZhuPerioperative Medical Big Data Research Group, Department of Anaesthesiology, 637250Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe tested the performance of general machine learning and joint machine learning algorithms in the classification of bone metastasis, in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

methodsWe used R version 3.5.3 for statistical analysis of the general information, and Python to construct machine learning models.

resultsWe first used the average classifiers of the 4 machine learning algorithms to rank the features and the results showed that race, sex, whether they had surgery and marriage were the first 4 factors affecting bone metastasis. Machine learning results in the training group: for area under the curve (AUC), except for RF and LR, the AUC values of all machine learning classifiers were greater than .8, but the joint algorithm did not improve the AUC for any single machine learning algorithm. Among the results related to accuracy and precision, the accuracy of other machine learning classifiers except the RF algorithm was higher than 70%, and only the precision of the LGBM algorithm was higher than 70%. Machine learning results in the test group: Similarly, for areas under the curve (AUC), except RF and LR, the AUC values for all machine learning classifiers were greater than .8, but the joint algorithm did not improve the AUC value for any single machine learning algorithm. For accuracy, except for the RF algorithm, the accuracy of other machine learning classifiers was higher than 70%. The highest precision for the LGBM algorithm was .675.

conclusionThe results of this concept verification study show that machine learning algorithm classifiers can distinguish the bone metastasis of patients with lung cancer. This will provide a new research idea for the future use of non-invasive technology to identify bone metastasis in lungcancer. However, more prospective multicenter cohort studies are needed.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsAgedAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningProspective StudiesROC CurveAUCbone metastasisdistinguishinglung adenocarcinomamachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37010850
PMCPMC10074626
OpenAlexW4362522050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.