Observational studyCJEM2023
Impact of bilingual face, arm, speech, time (FAST) public awareness campaigns on emergency medical services (EMS) activation in a large Canadian metropolitan area.
Observational study in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- BE FAST Versus FAST: A Randomized Pilot Trial Comparing Retention of Stroke Symptoms Between 2 Mnemonics.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Parallel activation of helicopter and ground transportation after dispatcher identification of suspected anterior large vessel occlusion stroke in rural areas: a proof-of-concept case with modeling from the LESTOR trial.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsFace, arm, speech, time (FAST) public awareness campaigns improve stroke recognition in the general population. Whether this translates into improved emergency medical services (EMS) activation remains unclear. We assessed the association of five consecutive FAST campaigns with EMS calls for suspected strokes in a large urban area of Quebec, Canada.
methodsWe conducted an observational study to assess data collected between June 2015 and December 2019 by the public EMS agency covering the cities of Laval and Montreal (Quebec, Canada). Five FAST campaigns were held over this period (mean duration: 9 weeks). We compared daily EMS calls before and after all FAST campaigns (2015 vs 2019) with t tests and Mann-Whitney U tests. We used single-group, univariate interrupted time series to measure changes in daily EMS calls for suspected strokes following each FAST campaign (stroke categories: any, symptom onset < 5 h, Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale [CPSS] 3/3). Calls for headache served as negative control.
resultsAfter five FAST campaigns, mean daily EMS calls increased by 28% (p < 0.001) for any suspected stroke and by 61% (p < 0.001) for stroke with symptom onset < 5 h, compared to 10.1% for headache (p = 0.012). Significant increases in daily EMS calls were observed after three campaigns (highest OR = 1.26; 95% CI 1.11, 1.43; p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in calls after individual campaigns for suspected stroke with symptom onset < 5 h, or suspected stroke with CPSS 3/3.
conclusionsWe observed an inconsistent impact of individual FAST campaigns on EMS calls for any suspected stroke, and did not observe significant EMS call changes after individual campaigns for acute (< 5 h) and severe (CPSS 3/3) strokes. These results may help stakeholders identify potential benefits and limitations of public awareness campaigns using the FAST acronym.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.