Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37010711›Full record

ReviewMedical & biological engineering & computing2023

Characterization of noise in long-term ECG monitoring with machine learning based on clinical criteria.

Roberto Holgado-Cuadrado, Carmen Plaza-Seco, Lisandro Lovisolo, Manuel Blanco-Velasco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roberto Holgado-CuadradoDepartment for Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad de Alcalá, 28800, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain. roberto.holgado@uah.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5913-341X
Carmen Plaza-SecoDepartment for Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad de Alcalá, 28800, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4714-1789
Lisandro LovisoloDepartment for Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad de Alcalá, 28800, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7404-9371
Manuel Blanco-VelascoDepartment for Signal Theory and Communications, Universidad de Alcalá, 28800, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-1517

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise and artifacts affect strongly the quality of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in long-term ECG monitoring (LTM), making some of its parts impractical for diagnosis. The clinical severity of noise defines a qualitative quality score according to the manner clinicians make the interpretation of the ECG, in contrast to assess noise from a quantitative standpoint. So clinical noise refers to a scale of different levels of qualitative severity of noise which aims at elucidating which ECG fragments are valid to achieve diagnosis from a clinical point of view, unlike the traditional approach, which assesses noise in terms of quantitative severity. This work proposes the use of machine learning (ML) techniques to categorize different qualitative noise severity using a database annotated according to a clinical noise taxonomy as gold standard. A comparative study is carried out using five representative ML methods, namely, K neareast neighbors, decision trees, support vector machine, single-layer perceptron, and random forest. The models are fed by signal quality indexes characterizing the waveform in time and frequency domains, as well as from a statistical viewpoint, to distinguish between clinically valid ECG segments from invalid ones. A solid methodology to prevent overfitting to both the dataset and the patient is developed, taking into account balance of classes, patient separation, and patient rotation in the test set. All the proposed learning systems have demonstrated good classification performance, attaining a recall, precision, and F1 score up to 0.78, 0.80, and 0.77, respectively, in the test set by a single-layer perceptron approach. These systems provide a classification solution for assessing the clinical quality of the ECG taken from LTM recordings. Graphical Abstract Clinical Noise Severity Classification based on Machine Learning techniques towards Long-Term ECG Monitoring.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsArtifactsHumansMachine LearningRandom ForestClinical noise severityElectrocardiogram (ECG)Long-term monitoring (LTM)Machine learning (ML)Signal quality

Identifiers

PMID37010711
PMCPMC10412684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.