ArticleMolecular diversity2024
Anticancer activity, DFT study, ADMET prediction, and molecular docking of novel α-sulfamidophosphonates.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chalcone-sulfonate ester derivatives as dual urease and α-amylase inhibitors: synthesis, biological evaluation and integrated computational studies.RSC advances · 2026Article
- DFT studies of metal oxide nanocluster as a possible drug delivery system for mechlorethamine.BMC chemistry · 2025Article
- An attempt to prepare sulfonyl analogues of fotemustine: unexpected rearrangement to sulfamate during nitrosation step.RSC advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A series of novel α-sulfamidophosphonate derivatives (3a-3 g) were synthesized and evaluated for anticancer activity against different human cancer cell lines (PRI, K562, and JURKAT). The antitumor activity of all compounds using the MTT test remains moderate compared to the standard drug chlorambucil. Compounds 3c and 3 g were found to be more active anticancer agent against PRI and K562 cells with IC50 value 0.056-0.097 and 0.182-0.133 mM, respectively. Molecular docking study related to binding affinity and binding mode analysis showed that synthesized compounds had potential to inhibit glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII). Furthermore, computational analysis was performed through Density Functional Theory (DFT) utilizing the B3LYP 6-31 G (d, p) basis set and the theoretical results were correlated with experimental data. The ADME/toxicity analyses carried out by Swiss ADME and OSIRIS software show that all synthesized molecules exhibited good pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, and had no toxicity profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37010709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.