Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37010650›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2023

Convolutional neural networks on risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography.

Rafael Adolf, Nejva Nano, Alessa Chami, Claudio E von Schacky, Albrecht Will, Eva Hendrich, Stefan A Martinoff, Martin Hadamitzky

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. AI-Driven multi-view learning from CCTA for myocardial infarction diagnosis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael AdolfDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Nejva NanoDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Alessa ChamiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum München Neuperlach, Munich, Germany.
Claudio E von SchackyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar of Munich Technical University, Munich, Germany.
Albrecht WillDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Eva HendrichDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Stefan A MartinoffDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Martin HadamitzkyDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, German Heart Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstrasse 36, 80636, Munich, Germany. mhy@dhm.mhn.de.
Technical University of Munich · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DEMünchen Klinik Neuperlach · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To assess the prognostic value of convolutional neural networks (CNN) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in comparison to conventional computed tomography (CT) reporting and clinical risk scores. 5468 patients who underwent CCTA with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. Primary endpoint was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina or late revascularization (> 90 days after CCTA). Early revascularization was additionally included as a training endpoint for the CNN algorithm. Cardiovascular risk stratification was based on Morise score and the extent of CAD (eoCAD) as assessed on CCTA. Semiautomatic post-processing was performed for vessel delineation and annotation of calcified and non-calcified plaque areas. Using a two-step training of a DenseNet-121 CNN the entire network was trained with the training endpoint, followed by training the feature layer with the primary endpoint. During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 334 patients. CNN showed an AUC of 0.631 ± 0.015 for prediction of the combined primary endpoint, while combining it with conventional CT and clinical risk scores showed an improvement of AUC from 0.646 ± 0.014 (based on eoCAD only) to 0.680 ± 0.015 (p < 0.0001) and from 0.619 ± 0.0149 (based on Morise Score only) to 0.6812 ± 0.0145 (p < 0.0001), respectively. In a stepwise model including all prediction methods, it was found an AUC of 0.680 ± 0.0148. CNN analysis showed to improve conventional CCTA-derived and clinical risk stratification when evaluating CCTA of patients with suspected CAD.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk AssessmentTomography, X-Ray ComputedConvolutional neural networksCoronary artery diseaseCoronary computed tomography angiographyPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID37010650
PMCPMC10220106
OpenAlexW4362505778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.