Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37010643›Full record

Trial reportLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

A randomized controlled trial evaluating effects of prophylactic irrigation-suction near pancreaticojejunostomy on postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Ronggui Lin, Yuhuang Liu, Xianchao Lin, Fengchun Lu, Yuanyuan Yang, Congfei Wang, Haizong Fang, Yanchang Chen, Heguang Huang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronggui LinDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Yuhuang LiuDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Xianchao LinDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Fengchun LuDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Yuanyuan YangDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Congfei WangDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Haizong FangDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Yanchang ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Heguang HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China. Heguanghuang2@163.com.
Union Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) is a common complication after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, whether irrigation-suction (IS) decreases the incidence and severity of CR-POPF has not yet been well elucidated.

methodsOne hundred and twenty patients with planned PD were enrolled in the study at a high-volume pancreatic center in China from August 2018 to January 2020. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate whether irrigation-suction (IS) decreases the incidence and severity of CR-POPF and other postoperative complications after PD. The primary endpoint was the incidence of CR-POPF, and the secondary endpoints were other postoperative complications.

resultsSixty patients were assigned to the control group and 60 patients to the IS group. The IS group had a comparable POPF rate (15.0% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.806) but a lower incidence of intra-abdominal infection (8.3% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.033) than the control group. The incidences of other postoperative complications were comparable in the two groups. The subgroup analysis for patients with intermediate/high risks for POPF also showed an equivalent POPF rate (17.0% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.800) and a significantly decreased incidence of intra-abdominal infection (8.5% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.020) in the IS group than that in the control group. The logistic regression models indicated that POPF was an independent risk factor for intra-abdominal infection (OR 0.049, 95% CI 0.013-0.182, p = 0.000).

conclusionsIrrigation-suction near pancreaticojejunostomy does not reduce the incidence or severity of postoperative pancreatic fistula but decreases the incidence of intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Indexed as

Pancreatic FistulaPancreaticojejunostomyHumansPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSuctionPancreatic fistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative complicationRonggui Lin and Yuhuang Liu have contributed equally to this work.

Identifiers

PMID37010643
OpenAlexW4362521883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.