Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37010602›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Drilling accuracy evaluation of a mouldable surgical targeting system for minimally invasive access to anatomic targets in the temporal bone.

Lena Geiger, M Geraldine Zuniga, Thomas Lenarz, Omid Majdani, Thomas S Rau

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Lena GeigerDepartment of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
M Geraldine ZunigaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas LenarzDepartment of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Omid Majdani *Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas S Rau *Department of Otolaryngology and Cluster of Excellence EXC 2177/1 "Hearing4all", Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. rau.thomas@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7223-3618
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2177/1 project ID 390895286Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RA 2751/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMinimally invasive cochlear implant surgery using a micro-stereotactic surgical targeting system with on-site moulding of the template aims for a reliable, less experience-dependent access to the inner ear under maximal reduction of trauma to anatomic structures. We present an accuracy evaluation of our system in ex-vivo testing.

methodsEleven drilling experiments were performed on four cadaveric temporal bone specimens. The process involved preoperative imaging after affixing the reference frame to the skull, planning of a safe trajectory preserving relevant anatomical structures, customization of the surgical template, execution of the guided drilling and postoperative imaging for determination of the drilling accuracy. Deviation between the drilled and desired trajectories was measured at different depths.

resultsAll drilling experiments were successfully performed. Other than purposely sacrificing the chorda tympani in one experiment, no other relevant anatomy, such as facial nerve, chorda tympani, ossicles or external auditory canal were harmed. Deviation between the desired and achieved path was found to be 0.25 ± 0.16 mm at skulls' surface and 0.51 ± 0.35 mm at the target level. The closest distance of the drilled trajectories' outer circumference to the facial nerve was 0.44 mm.

conclusionsWe demonstrated the usability for drilling to the middle ear on human cadaveric specimen in a pre-clinical setting. Accuracy proved to be suitable for many applications such as procedures within the field of image-guided neurosurgery. Promising approaches to reach sufficient submillimetre accuracy for CI surgery have been outlined.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsSurgery, Computer-AssistedCadaverHumansTemporal BoneCochlear implantationDrilling accuracyImage-guided surgeryMicro-stereotactic frameMinimally invasive surgerySurgical template

Identifiers

PMID37010602
PMCPMC10477231
OpenAlexW4362507225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.