Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37010547›Full record

Trial reportPediatric radiology2023

Effectiveness of training before unsedated MRI scans in young children: a randomized control trial.

Sarah Fletcher, David Lardner, Mercedes Bagshawe, Lisa Carsolio, Martin Sherriff, Cathy Smith, Catherine Lebel

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah FletcherFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, T3B6A8, Vancouver, Canada.
David LardnerAlberta Children's Hospital, T3B6A8, Calgary, Canada.
Mercedes BagshaweUniversity of Calgary, T3B6A8, Calgary, Canada.
Lisa CarsolioAlberta Children's Hospital, T3B6A8, Calgary, Canada.
Martin SherriffAlberta Children's Hospital, T3B6A8, Calgary, Canada.
Cathy SmithAlberta Children's Hospital, T3B6A8, Calgary, Canada.
Catherine LebelUniversity of Calgary, T3B6A8, Calgary, Canada. clebel@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0344-4032
Alberta Children's Hospital · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung children requiring clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be given general anesthesia. General anesthesia has potential side effects, is costly, and introduces logistical challenges. Thus, methods that allow children to undergo awake MRI scans are desirable.

objectivesTo compare the effectiveness of mock scanner training with a child life specialist, play-based training with a child life specialist, and home book and video preparation by parents to allow non-sedated clinical MRI scanning in children aged 3-7 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsChildren (3-7 years, n=122) undergoing clinical MRI scans at the Alberta Children's Hospital were invited to participate and randomized to one of three groups: home-based preparation materials, training with a child life specialist (no mock MRI), or training in a mock MRI with a child life specialist. Training occurred a few days prior to their MRI. Self- and parent-reported functioning (PedsQL VAS) were assessed pre/post-training (for the two training groups) and pre/post-MRI. Scan success was determined by a pediatric radiologist.

resultsOverall, 91% (111/122) of children successfully completed an awake MRI. There were no significant differences between the mock scanner (89%, 32/36), child life (88%, 34/39), and at-home (96%, 45/47) groups (P=0.34). Total functioning scores were similar across groups; however, the mock scanner group had significantly lower self-reported fear (F=3.2, P=0.04), parent-reported sadness (F=3.3, P=0.04), and worry (F=3.5, P=0.03) prior to MRI. Children with unsuccessful scans were younger (4.5 vs. 5.7 years, P<0.001).

conclusionsMost young children can tolerate awake MRI scans and do not need to be routinely anesthetized. All preparation methods tested, including at-home materials, were effective.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralMagnetic Resonance ImagingAnxietyChildChild, PreschoolHospitals, PediatricHumansParentsAnesthesiaChildChild lifeMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologySedation

Identifiers

PMID37010547
OpenAlexW4362505702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.