ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2023
Estro-progestin and progestogen intake: What's the impact on hysteroscopic imaging?
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In current literature there is no report aimed to evaluate the effects of exogenous steroids on hysteroscopic imaging. Objectives: To evaluate the hysteroscopic features of endometrium in women undergoing female hormones administration. Materials and Methods: We reviewed video-records of hysteroscopies carried-out in women taking estro-progestins (EP), progestogen (P) and Hormonal Replacement Therapy (HRT). All women underwent biopsies resulting in atrophic, functional, or dysfunctional pathological reports. Main outcome measures: Description of hysteroscopic pictures related to each schedule of therapy. Results: The study included 117 women. We evaluated 82, 24 and 11 women treated by EP, P and HRT, respectively. In EP users, imaging indistinguishable from physiological pictures was found when high oestrogen dosage and low-potency progestogen as 17-OH progesterone derivatives were administered. By enhancing progestogen potency with 19-norprogesterone and 19-nortestosterone derivatives we observed a promotion of progestogen differentiation such as polypoid-papillary pseudo-decidualisation, spiral artery differentiation, inhibition of gland-proliferation and endometrial atrophy. In P users we distinguished two patterns, depending on continuous or sequential schedules. Continuous therapy resulted in atrophic or proliferative-secretory features whereas sequential ones led to endometrial overgrowth reflecting stromal pseudo-decidualisation. Women undergoing HRT showed atrophic features in combined continuous and polypoid overgrowth in sequential schedules. In women taking Tibolone we found pictures ranging from atrophic to hyperplastic appearances. Conclusions: Exogenous steroids lead to significant endometrial moulding. Depending on schedule, hysteroscopic-view appears predictable and often showing overgrowths mimicking proliferative pathologies. In this case biopsy is recommended but in common practice physicians should gain awareness with hysteroscopic pictures induced from hormone administration. What is new?: Systematic assessment of hysteroscopic pictures during estro-progestins intake.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.