ReviewMass spectrometry reviews
Probe-based mass spectrometry approaches for single-cell and single-organelle measurements.
Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-cell mass spectrometry imaging: platform advances for multimodal spatial omics.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Development of a Tapping-Mode Scanning Probe Electrospray Ionization Platform for High-Sensitivity and Long-Term Stability in Single-Cell Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Tissue.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Review
- Frontier Technologies in Single-Cell Analysis: Synergistic Fusion of Droplet Printing and High-Performance Detection System.Analytical science advances · 2025Review
- High-Throughput Fluorescence-Guided Sequential Single-Cell MALDI-ICC Mass Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Enhancing lipid production in plant cells through automated high-throughput genome engineering and phenotyping.The Plant cell · 2025Article
- Advances in multimodal mass spectrometry for single-cell analysis and imaging enhancement.FEBS letters · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exploring the chemical content of individual cells not only reveals underlying cell-to-cell chemical heterogeneity but is also a key component in understanding how cells combine to form emergent properties of cellular networks and tissues. Recent technological advances in many analytical techniques including mass spectrometry (MS) have improved instrumental limits of detection and laser/ion probe dimensions, allowing the analysis of micron and submicron sized areas. In the case of MS, these improvements combined with MS's broad analyte detection capabilities have enabled the rise of single-cell and single-organelle chemical characterization. As the chemical coverage and throughput of single-cell measurements increase, more advanced statistical and data analysis methods have aided in data visualization and interpretation. This review focuses on secondary ion MS and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization MS approaches for single-cell and single-organelle characterization, which is followed by advances in mass spectral data visualization and analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.