ArticleHuman genetics2023
Predicting ExWAS findings from GWAS data: a shorter path to causal genes.
Article in Human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prioritizing effector genes at trait-associated loci using multimodal evidence.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Translation of genome-wide association study: from genomic signals to biological insights.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
GWAS has identified thousands of loci associated with disease, yet the causal genes within these loci remain largely unknown. Identifying these causal genes would enable deeper understanding of the disease and assist in genetics-based drug development. Exome-wide association studies (ExWAS) are more expensive but can pinpoint causal genes offering high-yield drug targets, yet suffer from a high false-negative rate. Several algorithms have been developed to prioritize genes at GWAS loci, such as the Effector Index (Ei), Locus-2-Gene (L2G), Polygenic Prioritization score (PoPs), and Activity-by-Contact score (ABC) and it is not known if these algorithms can predict ExWAS findings from GWAS data. However, if this were the case, thousands of associated GWAS loci could potentially be resolved to causal genes. Here, we quantified the performance of these algorithms by evaluating their ability to identify ExWAS significant genes for nine traits. We found that Ei, L2G, and PoPs can identify ExWAS significant genes with high areas under the precision recall curve (Ei: 0.52, L2G: 0.37, PoPs: 0.18, ABC: 0.14). Furthermore, we found that for every unit increase in the normalized scores, there was an associated 1.3-4.6-fold increase in the odds of a gene reaching exome-wide significance (Ei: 4.6, L2G: 2.5, PoPs: 2.1, ABC: 1.3). Overall, we found that Ei, L2G, and PoPs can anticipate ExWAS findings from widely available GWAS results. These techniques are therefore promising when well-powered ExWAS data are not readily available and can be used to anticipate ExWAS findings, allowing for prioritization of genes at GWAS loci.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37009933What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.