Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009923›Full record

ReviewLung2023

Nanopore-Based Metagenomic Sequencing in Respiratory Tract Infection: A Developing Diagnostic Platform.

Robert Chapman, Luke Jones, Alberto D'Angelo, Ahmed Suliman, Muhammad Anwar, Stefan Bagby

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Capturing clinically relevantMicrobial genomics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert ChapmanPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Hamstel Road, Harlow, CM20 1QX, UK. robert.chapman2@nhs.net.
Luke JonesDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Alberto D'AngeloDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Ahmed SulimanPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Hamstel Road, Harlow, CM20 1QX, UK.
Muhammad AnwarPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Hamstel Road, Harlow, CM20 1QX, UK.
Stefan BagbyDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bath · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory tract infection (RTI) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality across the globe. The optimal management of RTI relies upon timely pathogen identification via evaluation of respiratory samples, a process which utilises traditional culture-based methods to identify offending microorganisms. This process can be slow and often prolongs the use of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, whilst also delaying the introduction of targeted therapy as a result. Nanopore sequencing (NPS) of respiratory samples has recently emerged as a potential diagnostic tool in RTI. NPS can identify pathogens and antimicrobial resistance profiles with greater speed and efficiency than traditional sputum culture-based methods. Increased speed to pathogen identification can improve antimicrobial stewardship by reducing the use of broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, as well as improving overall clinical outcomes. This new technology is becoming more affordable and accessible, with some NPS platforms requiring minimal sample preparation and laboratory infrastructure. However, questions regarding clinical utility and how best to implement NPS technology within RTI diagnostic pathways remain unanswered. In this review, we introduce NPS as a technology and as a diagnostic tool in RTI in various settings, before discussing the advantages and limitations of NPS, and finally what the future might hold for NPS platforms in RTI diagnostics.

Indexed as

NanoporesNanopore SequencingRespiratory Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMetagenomicsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial stewardshipDiagnosticsMycobacteriaNanopore sequencingNext generation sequencingRespiratory tract infectionTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID37009923
PMCPMC10067523
OpenAlexW4362506045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.