Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37009841›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2023

Women's sexually transmitted infections in primary care: General practitioners' challenges and strategies - A qualitative study in Germany.

Pauline Meurer, Christoph Heintze, Angela Schuster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Case scenario: Management of sexually transmitted infections in primary care based on the fifth edition of the Malaysian guidelines.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pauline MeurerCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Institute of General Practice, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6749-0652
Christoph HeintzeCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Institute of General Practice, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2179-8192
Angela SchusterCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin; Institute of General Practice, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-3177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) is rising. Amongst women, STIs are often asymptomatic and thus likely underreported. STI care in Germany is fragmented. General Practitioners (GPs) could offer accessible care; however, to which extent GPs provide STI care and which challenges they face remains unclear.

objectivesTo increase understanding of how GPs provide STI care for women in German high-incidence settings and to identify challenges and opportunities for improved care.

methodsBetween 10/20 and 09/21, we contacted 75 practices using snowball and theoretical sampling. We conducted qualitative guide-assisted interviews with 19 GPs in their practices in Berlin, Germany. Data were analysed using thematic analysis with grounded theory components.

resultsResponsibilities and financing of STI care services were unclear. Most GPs perceived specialised doctors to be responsible for STI care in women; however, many non-STI specialised doctors were the first point of contact for patients and felt responsible to help. (LBTQI) Women were perceived to have less access to care. Stigmatising perceptions of women with STI-related needs were common. Doctors immediately referred patients to other providers, offered STI care for selected cases, or routinely offered primary STI care. GPs' referral strategies were often unsystematic. Those who offered primary STI care perceived patients' need for STI care, showed open attitudes to sexual health, and had undergone further training on STI care.

conclusionTraining regarding STI care, remuneration, and referral pathways should be provided for GPs. Comprehensive STI care could be offered through the cooperation of GPs and specialists.

Indexed as

General PractitionersSexually Transmitted DiseasesAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGermanyHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health Caregeneral practiceGermanyprimary health careSTIwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID37009841
PMCPMC10071968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.